Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
Published on: February 26, 2014
A Systematic Survey of the Optimal Strategy for Dealing With Missing Binary Outcomes in Simulation Studies of
Yanjiao Shen1,2,3, Parpia Sameer4, Xin Xia1
1Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics/National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Aim:
To summarize the optimal strategies for dealing with missing binary outcome data (MBOD) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as informed by simulation studies, and to summarize the quality of reporting in these studies.
Methods:
To identify simulation studies comparing at least two strategies to deal with MBOD and evaluating their performance (bias, coverage and power), we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via Ovid, Web of Science, and JSTOR from their inception up to December 20, 2023. We evaluated reporting quality using established criteria for simulation studies in medical statistics. We summarized data using descriptive statistics and a narrative synthesis.
Results:
Our search identified 29,460 citations, of which five proved eligible. Multiple imputation (MI), investigated in five studies, showed consistently good performance in all domains tested for missing completely at random (MCAR) and missing at random (MAR) but with important limitations in missing not at random (MNAR). Complete case analysis (CCA), investigated in four studies of which three addressed model-based CCA, performed well in bias and coverage under MAR and MCAR, but less well for MNAR. One study reported that non-model-based CCA performed poorly with respect to bias under MAR. Non-model-based single imputation, investigated in two studies, showed consistently poor performance across all domains tested for MAR, MCAR and MNAR. One study reported that model-based single imputation performed well with respect to bias under MAR. Regarding reporting quality, all studies reported the aims, dependence of simulated data sets, scenarios and statistical methods evaluated, number of simulations performed, justification of data generation and criteria used to evaluate the simulation performance. None of the studies reported the starting seeds, random number generators and failures occurring during simulation.
Conclusions:
Simulation studies address methods to deal with MBOD in RCTs, provided evidence that the MI approach is superior with respect to bias and coverage compared with CCA. Non-model-based single imputation generally performed poorly.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Censoring Survival Data
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Assumptions of Survival Analysis