Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

A Method for Remotely Silencing Neural Activity in Rodents During Discrete Phases of Learning
Published on: June 22, 2015
Dynamic Neural Deactivation Bridges Direct and Competitive Inhibition Processes
Zhenhong He1, Yifan Du2, Ziqi Fu3
1School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
None:
Inhibition is an important concept in cognitive neuroscience. Direct inhibition, characterized by the active suppression of stimuli, and competition-induced inhibition, which involves ignoring irrelevant stimuli by prioritizing relevant ones, have traditionally been considered distinct and studied separately. Although their spatial neural overlap has been highlighted, the temporal dimension-the development of neural activities over time-remains largely unexplored. Using multimodal neuroimaging and behavioral experiments in the auditory and visual domains, in addition to conjunction analyses that capture their neural commonalities, we observed that both inhibition types exhibit a shared deactivation temporal dynamic. It is characterized by a progressive reduction in frontoparietal activation and increased deactivation in sensory regions, a pattern that is positively correlated with improved inhibition performance and whose causal disruption contributes to reduced inhibitory effect. Furthermore, this deactivation-dominant pattern is consistent across different sensory modalities and generalizes to various low-processing demand scenarios, whether actively induced or passively experienced. In addition, functional blurring in information clarity during inhibition is found. Overall, the findings reveal that diverse inhibitory processes for modulating information input converge on a shared neural substrate characterized by dynamic feedforward signal attenuation, thereby bridging previously disconnected domains of inhibition research and offering new perspectives of neural deactivation.
More Related Videos
08:55Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition
Published on: February 8, 2018
10:19Induction of an Isoelectric Brain State to Investigate the Impact of Endogenous Synaptic Activity on Neuronal Excitability In Vivo
Published on: March 31, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Feedback Inhibition
Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptor: Gating Mechanism
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because...
Indirect-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Mechanism of Action
Reversible inhibitors like edrophonium bind to a specific part of the enzyme called the anionic catalytic site. They form noncovalent bonds, which means they are not strongly attached to the enzyme. This creates a temporary and less stable enzyme–inhibitor complex,...