Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Psychological factors beyond the SMART2 model for predicting recurrent events in atherosclerotic cardiovascular
Joris Holtrop1, Mari Nordbø Gynnild2,3,4,5, Toril Dammen6,7
1Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Background:
Guidelines recommend using cardiovascular (CV) risk prediction models to support treatment decisions. Psychological factors such as depression, anxiety, and insomnia may affect CV risk.
Aim:
Evaluating the added value of psychological factors on top of the SMART2 model for estimating 10-year risk of recurrent CV events in patients with atherosclerotic CV disease.
Methods:
Patients aged 40-80 with atherosclerotic CV disease were included from the UCC-SMART, HUNT3, HUNT4, NORCOR, and Nor-COAST cohorts. Potential added value of (self-reported) symptoms, diagnoses, and treatment for depression, anxiety, and insomnia on top of the SMART2 was investigated using Fine and Gray models, with SMART2 coefficients as an offset. Added value was assessed by change (Δ) in C-statistic and calibration.
Results:
20,050 patients were eligible, with 2,987 experiencing recurrent CV events. Psychological factors were present in 3-9%, 3-45% and 10-14% of patients for diagnosis, self-reported symptoms and prescribed treatment, respectively. No psychological factors were significantly associated with recurrent CV events on top of SMART2 and performance in patients with psychological factors was adequate (C-statistics 0.61 to 0.70). Added value of psychological factors was minimal, with the ΔC-statistic ranging from -0.0003 [95% confidence interval: -0.0005-0.0001] for symptoms of depression, to 0.0011 [0.0011-0.0011] for prescribed treatment with anxiolytics. There was no relevant difference in calibration.
Conclusions:
SMART2 model reliably estimates recurrent CV event risk in patients with psychological factors. Psychological factors have no added value to CV risk prediction when integrated on top of the SMART2 risk score.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
13:07Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia