Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Evaluating explanation performance for clinical decision support systems for non-imaging data: A systematic
Sneha Roychowdhury1, Vita Lanfranchi1, Suvodeep Mazumdar2
1School of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Purpose:
This review investigates the effectiveness of Explainable AI (XAI) in machine learning (ML)-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) using non-imaging data, focusing on explanation quality, clinical decision-making, user trust, and usability. It highlights clinician and patient perspectives to assess XAI's role in enhancing transparency and real-world adoption.
Method:
A methodological and usability-focused systematic review using Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ACM Digital Library was conducted using keyword combinations, such as "XAI" AND "CDSS" AND "Evaluation metrics" AND "User study OR Evaluation study".
Results:
The review identified an increase in multidisciplinary XAI healthcare research since 2023, with applications spanning intensive care, oncology, neurology, and clinical decision support systems. Studies commonly employed mixed-method evaluations, combining technical metrics (e.g., accuracy, fidelity) with human-centred assessments (e.g., trust, usability). Trustworthiness, interpretability, and transparency emerged as key XAI properties; however, aspects such as patient involvement, explanation usability, and clinical integration remain underexplored. Findings highlight ongoing challenges in balancing explanation faithfulness with user plausibility, and in aligning explanations with clinical reasoning and workflows.
Conclusions:
The study highlights the importance of striking a balance between technical fidelity and human interpretability, achieved through human-centred evaluation frameworks that incorporate both objective and subjective metrics to enhance the real-world applicability of XAI tools. Future research should focus more on human-centred AI/XAI frameworks and real-world evaluations that prioritise multi-stakeholder collaboration to enhance clinical decision support, improve diagnostic accuracy, and enable personalised care without compromising clinician expertise or patient safety.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Patient-centered Care
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...