Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: January 18, 2018
Invisible harm in patient safety: a framework and definition for preventable psychological harm in cancer care
Lara Dreismann1,2, Sofia Zambrano1, Yvonne Pfeiffer3,4
1Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Background:
While patient safety is receiving increasing attention in healthcare services research and policies, it is mainly centred around prevention of physical harm. Preventable psychological harm (PPH) remains invisible in reports and quality measurements. As patients with cancer are particularly vulnerable due to the severity of their condition and therapies, they are exposed to risks such as non-physical adverse events. Recently, incidents of psychological harm have gained more attention in patient safety research, but a common and accepted definition and classification are missing.
Aim:
We aimed to develop a common definition of PPH and a corresponding framework to classify events, settled within patient safety concepts and terminology.
Methods:
Through a literature review, expert interviews from various healthcare backgrounds and workshops with patient representatives, we gathered information on PPH, which was reviewed and structured by an interdisciplinary research team (patient safety, psycho-oncology, palliative care research, nursing, organisational psychology). The final definition and framework were iteratively developed taking into account existing patient safety concepts.
Results:
The definition broadens the classification of PPH to include a wide range of commissions and omissions by individuals or organizational practices within the health care system. These actions and inactions result in consequences of varying severity for patients and their close ones. The framework complements the definition of PPH, including those impacted by PPH, types of PPH, potential causes and contributing factors, vulnerabilities influencing severity and occurrence, moderating factors for mitigation and negative consequences of PPH.
Conclusions:
Defining and classifying PPH is the first step to make it accessible for measurement, analysis and prevention. Its integration within patient safety terminology is important to ensure uptake and integration in research and practice.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Torts II
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts I
Intentional...

