Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Understanding structural barriers to abortion care under the counselling regulation in Germany: results of a
Amelie Kolandt1, Susanne Michl2, Mirjam Faissner2
1Institute for the History of Medicine and Ethics in Medicine, Charité - University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany amelie.kolandt@charite.de.
Objective:
Abortion care in Germany is under-researched. Available data show regional disparities in the availability and accessibility of abortion services, but the structural causes for this remain unclear. In Germany, abortion is technically illegal but is exempt from punishment under the counselling regulation, which means that the pregnant person has to undergo mandatory counselling and observe a 3-day waiting period. This qualitative interview study examines the perspectives of abortion care providers on the provision of abortion care under this regulation in Germany.
Design:
We included 42 gynaecologists and abortion counsellors nationwide. We conducted in-depth, guideline-based interviews that explored the participants' perspectives on challenges in abortion care. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. The results were evaluated against the WHO's components of the right to sexual and reproductive health: availability, accessibility, acceptability, quality, and equity, inclusivity and patient-centredness of care.
Results:
We identified various structural barriers that limit the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality of abortion care under the counselling regulation in Germany. Interviewees named the shortage of doctors performing abortions as one structural root cause for insufficient abortion care that is exacerbated by the procedure's criminalisation. A lack of information transparency, complex legal requirements, language barriers, disinformation as well as social stigmatisation were cited as important barriers to abortion care. These barriers were described as having a particularly strong impact on patients from marginalised groups.
Conclusions:
Our study indicates that structural barriers associated with the current legal regulation create significant hurdles for both patients and providers and undermine the access, availability, acceptability, quality of care, and patient-centredness of care. In this context, we strongly support the recommendation of the German government's expert commission to revise the current legal regulation of abortion in Germany.
More Related Videos
11:53Laparoscopic Oocyte Retrieval and Cryopreservation during Vaginoplasty for Treatment of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome
Published on: May 10, 2022
09:51Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators
Published on: March 21, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Birth Control Methods
Physiological Barriers
The blood endothelial barrier is the most porous of these. It allows all small ionized, un-ionized, and lipophilic molecules to pass through the endothelial lining into the interstitial space...
Standards of Care I
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...