Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
External validation of calculator for cesarean delivery during induction of labor
Claudia J Ibarra1, Rachel L Wiley2, Han-Yang Chen1
1Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Houston Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Objective:
To validate a published risk calculator to predict cesarean delivery (CD) among singletons undergoing induction of labor.
Methods:
Our retrospective cohort study included singletons undergoing induction of labor. A predicted CD score was calculated for each individual based on a previously developed calculator. External validation of the calculator was assessed by the discriminative power of the model by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and by a calibration curve. The score was categorized as less than 10%, 10% to less than 30%, and 30% or greater. The primary outcome was CD. The secondary outcomes were a composite maternal adverse outcome (CMAO) and composite neonatal adverse outcome (CNAO). Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to estimate the association; adjusted relative risks with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
Results:
Among 548 women, 159 (29%) had CD. The area under the curve was 0.77 (95% CI 0.73-0.81), and the calibration curve and its 95% confidence band demonstrated good calibration. The likelihood of having a CD was higher in those with a score from 10% to less than 30% (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 2.65, 95% CI 1.58-4.45) and 30% or greater (aRR 5.73, 95% CI 3.55-9.25). The risk of CMAO was higher in those with a score between 10% and less than 30% (aRR 1.64, 95% CI 1.08-2.48) and 30% or greater (aRR 1.81, 95% CI 1.20-2.73). The risk of CNAO was similar across groups.
Conclusions:
The previously developed prediction model demonstrated good external validity in our cohort. Our analyses suggest that a higher predicted CD score was associated with an increased likelihood of CD and CMAO.
Related Concept Videos
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...

