Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

2.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
2.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

12.5K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
12.5K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

965
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
965
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

174
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
174

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterization of Immune Infiltrating Cells in Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma and Its Clinical Significance.

Cancer medicine·2026
Same author

Assessing data extraction in randomized clinical trials with large language models.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Diagnostic performance of advanced large language models in cystoscopy: evidence from a retrospective study and clinical cases.

BMC urology·2025
Same author

UHRF1 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition mediating renal fibrosis by activating the TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

RRM2 Is a Putative Biomarker and Promotes Bladder Cancer Progression via PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway.

Journal of cellular physiology·2024
Same author

Lactobacillus-Polydopamine System for Targeted Drug Delivery in Overactive Bladder: Evidence from Bladder Cell Spheroids, Rat Models, and Urinary Microbiome Profiling.

International journal of nanomedicine·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.0K

Data extraction error and its implications on systematic reviews in urology: a protocol.

Zuhaer Yisha1,2, Linfa Guo3, Aodun Gu3

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.

International Journal of Surgery Protocols
|August 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Data extraction errors in urological systematic reviews threaten evidence-based healthcare. This study assesses data reproducibility in these reviews, emphasizing the need for rigorous scrutiny in evidence synthesis to ensure reliable findings.

Keywords:
data extraction errorsevidence synthesis practicereproducibilityurology

More Related Videos

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
05:49

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking

Published on: October 10, 2019

6.7K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

32.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.0K
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking
05:49

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biopsy Data to Guide Sampling Procedures for Prostate Cancer Biobanking

Published on: October 10, 2019

6.7K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

32.0K

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Systematic reviews are crucial for healthcare decisions.
  • Data extraction errors in urological systematic reviews are a significant, often overlooked, threat.
  • There's a rising number of urology reviews lacking rigorous examination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate data reproducibility issues in urological systematic reviews.
  • To highlight the critical need for scrutiny in evidence synthesis.
  • To enhance methodological rigor and validity of conclusions in urological evidence synthesis.

Main Methods:

  • Examined data extraction errors in systematic reviews from 58 urology journals (PubMed, Embase).
  • Selected reviews with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.
  • Data extraction by two independent reviewers, cross-verified with original sources; errors categorized at multiple levels.
  • Statistical analyses assessed error prevalence and impact on meta-analytic results; sensitivity analyses explored missing data effects.

Main Results:

  • Prevalence and impact of data extraction errors on meta-analytic results were evaluated.
  • Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the effect of missing data on study outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Addresses the critical issue of data extraction errors in urology systematic reviews.
  • Enhances methodological rigor and improves the validity of conclusions in evidence synthesis.
  • Provides valuable insights into systematic review quality and guides future improvements in evidence-based practice.