Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Computer Assisted Design-Computer Assisted Manufacturing Nickel-Titanium Fixed Lingual Retainers Versus Conventional Flexible Multistrand Retainers on Tooth Displacements and Periodontal Ligament Stress Distributions in the Mandibular Anterior Teeth at Four Different Inclinations: A Finite Element Analysis.

Health science reports·2026
Same author

Links Between Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) With Aesthetic Components of Orthodontic Treatment Need Assessed by Orthodontic Patients or Orthodontists (IOTN-AC, IOTN-ACE) and Also With Its Risk Factors: An Epidemiological Cross-Sectional Study.

Health science reports·2026
Same author

Efficacy of Automatic 3D Segmentation of the Upper Airway in CBCT or CT Scans via Artificial Intelligence Versus Manual Segmentation by Human Experts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Clinical and experimental dental research·2026
Same author

Effects of Single-Session Treatment of Primary Teeth Under General Anesthesia Versus At-Office Multi-session Treatment on Permanent Molar Caries Status: Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Clinical and experimental dental research·2025
Same author

Risk factors for dental anxiety and cooperativeness in pediatric patients with or without oral habits (bruxism, nail biting, and thumb sucking).

BMC oral health·2025
Same author

Preliminary cytotoxicity assessment of Jaftex vs. chlorhexidine mouthwashes on human gingival fibroblasts and oral squamous cell carcinoma.

BMC oral health·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.5K

Accuracy and Reproducibility of Semidigital Versus Fully Digital Cephalometric Tracings Using a New Computer Program

Farhad Sobouti1,2, Sepideh Dadgar1,2, Sina Namadian3

  • 1Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

Biomed Research International
|August 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Digital cephalometric tracing software demonstrates high accuracy and reliability, comparable to conventional methods. This study confirms its diagnostic value for orthodontic procedures, ensuring precise measurements for patient care.

Keywords:
cephalometricscomputerized cephalometric tracingcomputerized dentistrydiagnostic accuracydigital dentistrydigital imaginglandmarkingmanual tracingorthodonticsreliabilityreproducibility

More Related Videos

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
06:51

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression

Published on: May 30, 2019

7.6K
Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.5K
Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
06:51

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression

Published on: May 30, 2019

7.6K
Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Digital Dentistry
  • Radiographic Analysis

Background:

  • Cephalometric tracing is crucial in orthodontics for diagnosis and treatment planning.
  • Digital advancements offer potential improvements in efficiency and accuracy.
  • Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of digital cephalometric software against conventional methods is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a specific computer-aided cephalometric tracing program.
  • To compare digital tracing methods with the conventional gold standard using stringent criteria.
  • To determine if digital tracing falls within clinically acceptable error margins.

Main Methods:

  • 10,302 tracing evaluations from 101 lateral cephalograms.
  • Comparison of three tracing methods: fully conventional, semi-digital, and fully digital.
  • Analysis of 15 landmarks and 17 measurements, calculating 6 types of tracing errors.
  • Statistical comparison of errors against clinically acceptable limits (2mm) and conservative criteria (zero, 1/100 of mean).

Main Results:

  • All tracing errors were below the clinically acceptable limit of 2mm.
  • Most simple errors were close to zero or below 1/100 of the gold standard mean.
  • Directionless absolute errors were below 2mm and comparable to the gold standard means.
  • High intraobserver reliability was observed across all methods.

Conclusions:

  • The evaluated digital cephalometric tracing program demonstrates appropriate accuracy.
  • Digital methods provide reliable measurements, comparable to the conventional gold standard.
  • The software is suitable for orthodontic diagnostic procedures, ensuring precision and consistency.