Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

7.7K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
7.7K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

296
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
296
Percentile01:18

Percentile

7.1K
A percentile indicates the relative standing of a data value when data are sorted into numerical order from smallest to largest. It represents the percentages of data values that are less than or equal to the pth percentile. For example, 15% of data values are less than or equal to the 15th percentile.
7.1K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.4K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.4K
Quartile01:15

Quartile

4.6K
Quartiles are numbers that separate the data into quarters. Quartiles may or may not be part of the data. To find the quartiles, first, find the median or second quartile. The first quartile, Q1, is the middle value of the lower half of the data, and the third quartile, Q3, is the middle value, or median, of the upper half of the data. To get the idea, consider the same data set:
1; 1; 2; 2; 4; 6; 6.8; 7.2; 8; 8.3; 9; 10; 10; 11.5
The median or second quartile is seven. The lower half of the...
4.6K
Modified Boxplots00:57

Modified Boxplots

10.1K
A standard box and whisker plot informs us about the spread of the data in a given sample. One can identify the minimum value, maximum value, first quartile value, second quartile or median value, and third quartile.
However, the box plot does not tell the reader about outliers - values that lie far from the center of the data. We can modify the standard box and whisker plot to identify the outliers and visualize the actual spread of the data in a sample.
Initially, we calculate the adjusted...
10.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Longitudinal associations of suffering with subsequent multidimensional well-being in the Global Flourishing Study.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

A cross-national study of demographic variation and childhood predictors of traumatic distress.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Novel Psychometric Indicator Assessments: The Relative Excess Correlation and Associated Matrices.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Demographic variation in symptoms of depression and anxiety across 22 Global Flourishing Study countries.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Demographic variation in weekly alcohol use across countries in the Global Flourishing Study.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Mental Health, Spirituality, and Flourishing in New Medical Residents.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.5K

The quantiles of extreme differences matrix for evaluating discriminant validity.

Tyler J VanderWeele1, R Noah Padgett2

  • 1Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Epidemiologic Methods
|August 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method, the quantiles of extreme differences matrix, to empirically distinguish between related survey items. This approach helps researchers better understand the nuances of psychosocial constructs.

Keywords:
discriminant validityfacetsfactor analysispsycho-social constructsquantiles

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

909

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.5K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

909

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Quantitative Psychology
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Assessing psychosocial constructs often involves multiple indicators.
  • Distinguishing between unified phenomena and distinct facets is crucial for construct validity.
  • Philosophical methods using limit cases inspire empirical approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an empirical method for establishing discriminant validity among survey indicators.
  • To provide a tool for differentiating between closely related and distinct facets of psychosocial constructs.
  • To adapt philosophical principles of distinction to survey data analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the quantiles of extreme differences matrix.
  • Analysis of differences between pairs of survey indicators at extreme quantiles.
  • Exploration of properties of the proposed matrix for indicator comparison.

Main Results:

  • The quantiles of extreme differences matrix quantifies differences between indicators at extreme distribution points.
  • This matrix offers a novel way to empirically assess distinctions among survey items.
  • The method provides insights into the structure of psychosocial constructs.

Conclusions:

  • The quantiles of extreme differences matrix is a valuable tool for assessing discriminant validity.
  • This empirical approach aids in clarifying the relationships among indicators of psychosocial constructs.
  • The method supports nuanced understanding of complex psychological phenomena.