Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
Published on: December 20, 2024
Comparison of the Utility of Single-Ear and Binaural Auscultations: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study
Masafumi Shimoda1,2, Jumpei Aso2, Yoshiaki Tanaka1
1Respiratory Disease Center, Fukujuji Hospital, Kiyose, JPN.
Introduction:
Single-ear (monaural) auscultation is occasionally used in lung examinations. In this method, a binaural stethoscope is placed in one ear, leaving the other ear free for listening to other sounds. To enhance the efficiency of medical examinations, interviews, and auscultation are sometimes performed simultaneously using single-ear auscultation. However, there are no studies reporting the accuracy of single-ear auscultation for lung examinations. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the utility of single-ear and binaural auscultations.
Materials And Methods:
We prospectively collected data from 35 respiratory physicians at Fukujuji Hospital and Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine from April 2024 to June 2024. Data on audible minimal volume, points earned from auscultation questions, and self-reported confidence levels for answers to auscultation questions were compared between single-ear and binaural auscultations in both quiet and noisy environments. Furthermore, participants were divided into those with a respiratory specialist qualification (specialist group) and those without the qualification (nonspecialist group), and subanalysis was performed between these two groups.
Results:
Single-ear auscultation resulted in fewer earned points than binaural auscultation in both quiet environments (median 12 points (range 7-15) vs. 13 points (9-16), p<0.001) and noisy environments (median 12 points (range 5-16) vs. 13 points (8-16), p=0.008). The average self-reported confidence levels were also lower for single-ear auscultation (quiet environment: p<0.001; noisy environment: p<0.001). The average audible minimal volume was not different between the single-ear and binaural auscultations (quiet environment: p=0.814; noisy environment: p=0.051). Twenty-three participants (65.7%) scored 1 or more points higher during binaural auscultation than during single-ear auscultation in both environments. There was no difference between the respiratory specialists and nonspecialists in the number of participants exhibiting advantages during binaural auscultation or in the difference in average audible minimal volume, earned points from auscultation questions, or average self-reported confidence levels for answers to auscultation questions between single-ear and binaural auscultations.
Conclusion:
The utility of single-ear auscultation for lung auscultation was less than that of binaural auscultation. Physicians should use a binaural stethoscope correctly and listen with both ears.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System IV: Auscultation
Normal Heart Sounds
S1 (First Heart Sound)-
S1 is made by the closure of the mitral and tricuspid valves (atrioventricular valves), marking the beginning of systole.
S2 (Second Heart Sound)-
S2 is made by the closure of the aortic and pulmonic valves (semilunar valves), marking the end of the systole.
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract IV: Auscultation
Breath Sounds
Breath sounds are categorized into vesicular, bronchovesicular, and bronchial.
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
Nursing Assessment of the Genitourinary System III: Percussion and Auscultation
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:

