Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025
Chair-Time During Polishing with Different Burs and Drills After Cement Customized Brackets Bonding: An In Vitro
Javier Flores-Fraile1, Alba Belanche Monterde1, Oscar Alonso-Ezpeleta2
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain.
A tungsten carbide bur is the most efficient tool for polishing after lingual bracket removal, significantly reducing chair-time in orthodontic treatments. This method ensures safety and effectiveness in dental procedures.
Area of Science:
- Dental materials science
- Orthodontic technology
- Clinical dentistry
Background:
- Digital planning and technological advancements are increasing dental efficiency.
- Indirect bonding with CAD-CAM software aims to reduce patient visits and chair-time in orthodontics.
- Optimizing debonding and polishing protocols is crucial for efficiency across various dental specialties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficiency of different burs and drills for polishing after lingual bracket debonding.
- To determine the safest and most time-efficient protocol for removing cement remnants from enamel.
- To compare polishing times and identify statistically significant differences between various instruments.
Main Methods:
- 504 teeth embedded in epoxy resin models were used.
- Customized lingual multibracket appliances were bonded and subsequently debonded.
- Cement remnants were polished using three different burs and two drills, with polishing time recorded.
Main Results:
- Significant statistical differences (p < 0.005) were found between diamond bur, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs.
- Diamond burs were identified as the slowest polishing instrument.
- Tungsten carbide burs were found to be the safest option for enamel polishing.
Conclusions:
- A tungsten carbide bur mounted in a turbine represents the most efficient polishing protocol after lingual bracket debonding.
- A two-step protocol involving a tungsten carbide bur followed by polishers is recommended for optimal results.
- Efficient polishing protocols are essential, especially in lingual orthodontics due to access difficulties.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
03:02Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
Published on: January 17, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Setting Time of Cement
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
Testing Water Quality
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is...
Abrasion Resistance of Concrete
One such test is the revolving disc test, where three plates...
Accelerated Curing of Concrete