Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Retrieval01:12

Retrieval

169
Retrieval is the process of getting information out of memory storage and back into conscious awareness. This ability is essential for daily tasks like brushing hair and teeth, driving to work, and performing job duties. Retrieval occurs in three ways: recall, recognition, and relearning.
Recall involves accessing information without cues, such as during an essay test, where individuals must retrieve facts and concepts from memory unaided. Another example is remembering the name of a colleague...
169
Metacognition01:26

Metacognition

280
Metacognition is a conscious process where individuals are aware of their cognitive and executive processes, such as planning before solving a problem or self-monitoring during reading. For instance, a writer may need help with composing a piece. The situation involves a writer who is working on a piece of writing, but while doing so, they realize that something is missing. They notice that their characters lack depth or details. This realization occurs because the writer is reflecting on their...
280
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

311
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
311
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

40.2K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
40.2K
Steps in the Modeling Process01:14

Steps in the Modeling Process

308
Albert Bandura's theory of observational learning identifies four critical processes: attention, retention, motor reproduction, and reinforcement or motivation.
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...
308
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

517
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
517

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Individual differences in false memories in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott Paradigm: An attention control account.

Consciousness and cognition·2025
Same author

How does math anxiety affect math performance? An experimental online two-study investigation into the mechanism driving math anxiety interventions.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Influence of Mind Wandering and Increased Attentional Demands on Multitasking and Implicit Learning.

Europe's journal of psychology·2025
Same author

The Relationship between Executive Functions and Metacognition in College Students.

Journal of Intelligence·2023
Same author

Unique Mechanisms for the Availability of Declarative Memory Elements and the Strengthening of Cognitive Operations.

Advances in cognitive psychology·2023
Same author

Metacognitive Cues, Working Memory, and Math Anxiety: The Regulated Attention in Mathematical Problem Solving (RAMPS) Framework.

Journal of Intelligence·2023
Same journal

Career Adaptability and Academic Achievement Among Chinese High School Students: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study of Social Cognitive and Metacognitive Mediating Mechanisms.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Preservice Science Teachers' Analogical Reasoning: Evidence from Analogy Design.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Supported Instruction on Student Learning in STEM: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

Reading and Writing Profiles in Twice-Exceptional Adolescents with Intellectual Giftedness and Dyslexia.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

Emotional Intelligence, Self-Regulation, and Children's Well-Being in Fourth-Grade Students: Cross-Sectional Associations from Türkiye.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
Same journal

Detecting Demographic Influences on Measures of Spatial Ability with Rasch Tree Analysis.

Journal of Intelligence·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K

Beyond the Prompt: Investigating Retrieval-Based Monitoring in Self-Regulated Learning.

Mengjiao Wu1, Christopher A Was2

  • 1College of Foreign Languages, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China.

Journal of Intelligence
|August 27, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Retrieval processes likely support study decisions in learning, even without explicit monitoring prompts. This research offers new ways to measure metacognitive monitoring during self-regulated learning.

Keywords:
controlmetacognitive monitoringretrievalself-regulated learning

More Related Videos

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes
10:43

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes

Published on: June 10, 2021

5.5K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K
Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes
10:43

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes

Published on: June 10, 2021

5.5K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Metacognitive monitoring is vital for self-regulated learning, guiding effective control and improving learning outcomes.
  • Existing research primarily examines metacognitive monitoring under explicit prompts, neglecting real-world scenarios where learners control study time.
  • Learners often make study decisions (e.g., allocating more time) in educational settings, necessitating an understanding of underlying cognitive processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if retrieval processes are engaged when learners make study decisions to control their learning.
  • To explore objective, online measures for detecting retrieval-based metacognitive monitoring.
  • To compare cognitive processes involved in explicit retrieval prompts versus implicit study decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments involving Swahili-English word pair learning with study decision tasks (Experiment 1) and comparisons between single-study, restudy, retrieval, and study decision groups (Experiments 2 & 3).
  • Data collection included accuracy, study decision reaction times (RTs), global judgments of learning (JOLs), judgments of confidence (JOCs), and self-reports.
  • Analysis focused on correlations between RTs, accuracy, JOLs, JOCs, and within-subject comparisons across different learning conditions.

Main Results:

  • Study decision reaction times positively correlated with test accuracy, JOLs, and JOCs, suggesting underlying retrieval.
  • No significant differences in test accuracy were found across groups, but retrieval prompts led to longer response times than study decisions.
  • Similar recall accuracy patterns for successfully retrieved/non-restudied items across retrieval and study decision interventions indicated shared cognitive processes.

Conclusions:

  • Retrieval processes likely support study decisions, though potentially less frequently or deeply than under explicit monitoring.
  • Shared cognitive mechanisms underlie both explicit retrieval and implicit study decision tasks.
  • The study provides evidence for objective, online measures to detect retrieval-based metacognitive monitoring in learning.