Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
Ten-Year Results of a Single-Center Trial Investigating Heart Rate Control with Ivabradine or Metoprolol Succinate in
Fabrice F Darche1,2, Alexandra C Alt1, Rasmus Rivinius1,2
1Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Insights
Ivabradine significantly reduced heart rate and NT-proBNP levels in heart transplant recipients (HTX). This led to improved 10-year survival rates, particularly reducing mortality from graft failure compared to metoprolol succinate.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Sinus tachycardia post-heart transplantation (HTX) due to graft denervation is linked to poorer survival outcomes.
- Effective heart rate control is crucial for managing post-HTX complications and improving patient prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term (10-year) efficacy of ivabradine versus metoprolol succinate for heart rate control in HTX recipients.
- To compare the impact of these heart rate-lowering agents on post-transplant survival and related outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Observational, retrospective, single-center study involving 110 HTX patients.
- Patients were treated with either ivabradine (n=54) or metoprolol succinate (n=56).
- Analysis included demographics, medications, heart rate, blood pressure, echocardiography, cardiac biomarkers, and survival data over 10 years.
Main Results:
- Ivabradine group showed significantly lower heart rate (72.7 bpm vs. 80.1 bpm) and NT-proBNP levels (588.4 pg/mL vs. 1229.0 pg/mL) at 10-year follow-up compared to metoprolol succinate.
- Overall mortality was significantly lower in the ivabradine group (20.4% vs. 46.4%; p=0.004).
- Mortality due to graft failure was markedly reduced with ivabradine (1.9% vs. 21.4%; p=0.001), with multivariate analysis confirming a decreased risk of death (HR 0.374; p=0.008).
Conclusions:
- Ivabradine demonstrated superior efficacy in heart rate reduction and lowering NT-proBNP levels in HTX recipients over 10 years.
- Treatment with ivabradine was associated with significantly improved 10-year survival after heart transplantation compared to metoprolol succinate.
- These findings suggest ivabradine as a beneficial therapeutic option for managing sinus tachycardia and improving long-term outcomes in HTX patients.
Abstract:
Aims: Sinus tachycardia after heart transplantation (HTX) due to cardiac graft denervation is associated with reduced post-transplant survival and requires adequate treatment. We analyzed the long-term effects of heart rate control with ivabradine or metoprolol succinate in HTX recipients. Methods: This observational retrospective single-center study analyzed the ten-year results of 110 patients receiving ivabradine (n = 54) or metoprolol succinate (n = 56) after HTX. Analysis included comparison of demographics, medications, heart rates, blood pressure values, echocardiographic features, cardiac catheterization data, cardiac biomarkers, and post-transplant survival including causes of death. Results: Both groups showed no significant differences concerning demographics or medications (except for ivabradine and metoprolol succinate). At 10-year follow-up, HTX recipients with ivabradine showed a significantly lower heart rate (72.7 ± 8.5 bpm) compared to baseline (88.8 ± 7.6 bpm; p < 0.001) and to metoprolol succinate (80.1 ± 8.1 bpm; p < 0.001), a significantly lower NT-proBNP level (588.4 ± 461.4 pg/mL) compared to baseline (3849.7 ± 1960.0 pg/mL; p < 0.001) and to metoprolol succinate (1229.0 ± 1098.6 pg/mL; p = 0.005), a significantly lower overall mortality (20.4% versus 46.4%; p = 0.004), and mortality due to graft failure (1.9% versus 21.4%; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a significantly decreased risk of death within 10 years after HTX in patients with post-transplant use of ivabradine (HR 0.374, CI 0.182-0.770; p = 0.008). Conclusions: In this single-center trial, patients with ivabradine revealed a significantly more pronounced heart rate reduction, a lower NT-proBNP level, and a superior 10-year survival after HTX.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

