Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Fabricating van der Waals Heterostructures with Precise Rotational Alignment
Published on: July 5, 2019
Van der Waals Magnetic Tunnel Junctions Based on Two-Dimensional 1T-VSe2 and Rotationally Aligned h-BN Monolayer
Qiaoxuan Zhang1,2, Cong Wang3, Wenjie Wang4
1Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Hebei University of Water Resources and Electric Engineering, Cangzhou 061001, China.
None:
Magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) are pivotal for spintronic applications such as magneto resistive memory and sensors. Two-dimensional van der Waals heterostructures offer a promising platform for miniaturizing MTJs while enabling the twist-angle engineering of their properties. Here, we investigate the impact of twisting the insulating barrier layer on the performance of a van der Waals MTJ with the structure graphene/1T-VSe2/h-BN/1T-VSe2/graphene, where 1T-VSe2 serves as the ferromagnetic electrodes and the monolayer h-BN acts as the tunnel barrier. Using first-principles calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) combined with the non-equilibrium Green's function (NEGF) formalism, we systematically calculate the spin-dependent transport properties for 18 distinct rotational alignments of the h-BN layer (0° to 172.4°). Our results reveal that the tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) ratio exhibits dramatic, rotation-dependent variations, ranging from 2328% to 24,608%. The maximum TMR occurs near 52.4°. An analysis shows that the twist angle modifies the d-orbital electronic states of interfacial V atoms in the 1T-VSe2 layers and alters the spin polarization at the Fermi level, thereby governing the spin-dependent transmission through the barrier. This demonstrates that rotational manipulation of the h-BN layer provides an effective means to engineer the TMR and performance of van der Waals MTJs.
Related Concept Videos
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals I
Van der Waals Interactions
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...

