Differences in PI-RADS Classification of Prostate Cancer Based on mpMRI Scans Taken 6 Weeks Apart

  • 0Department of Urology, Federal Armed Forces Hospital Koblenz, Ruebenacher Strasse 170, 56072 Koblenz, Germany.
Arbor +

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) showed consistency in lesion identification across two MRI scans. A 6-week interval between prostate MRI scans did not significantly impact biopsy outcomes.

Area Of Science

  • Radiology and Urology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background

  • Prostate cancer diagnosis relies on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS).
  • Consistency in PI-RADS scoring is crucial for accurate lesion identification and subsequent biopsy planning.
  • Variability in imaging protocols or time intervals between scans may affect diagnostic reliability.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To assess the consistency of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) lesion identification in prostate cancer.
  • To evaluate the impact of a 6-week interval between two multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans on biopsy results.
  • To analyze the correlation between PI-RADS scores and histological findings in a high-volume tertiary care setting.

Main Methods

  • Retrospective analysis of real-world data from 111 patients undergoing two prostate mpMRI scans between 2018-2022.
  • Scans were performed at different institutions with a median interval of 42 days.
  • MRI-fused biopsy was conducted 7 days after the second MRI.

Main Results

  • PI-RADS V and IV were the most common classifications for index lesions on in-house MRI (33.3% and 49.5%, respectively).
  • Cancer detection rates varied significantly by PI-RADS score, with PI-RADS V showing the highest detection rate (91.9%).
  • Malignant histology was found in 64.9% of targeted lesions and 57.7% of randomized biopsies; the biopsy plan was adjusted for 51.4% of patients.

Conclusions

  • The 6-week interval between sequential prostate MRI scans did not significantly compromise the quality or reliability of biopsy results.
  • PI-RADS classification remains a key factor in predicting cancer detection rates.
  • Consistent lesion identification and accurate biopsy planning are achievable even with a moderate time gap between imaging studies.