Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

In Vitro Model of Human Cutaneous Hypertrophic Scarring using Macromolecular Crowding
Published on: May 1, 2020
Causal links between programmed cell death and hypertrophic scars: Integrative analysis of multi-omics Mendelian
Yushen Zhang1, Chenyuyao Zhao1, Ran Zhao1
1Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated To Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, China.
Objective:
This study aims to explore the causal relationship between programmed cell death (PCD) genes and the formation of hypertrophic scars (HS) using integrative multi-omics analysis (including DNA methylation, gene expression, and protein abundance) alongside preliminary experimental validation.
Methods:
We leveraged publicly available databases (eQTL Gen, UKB-PPP, and FinnGen) to obtain quantitative trait loci (QTLs) data of DNA methylation, gene expression and protein abundance. We employed Mendelian randomization (MR) approaches to uncover causal relationships and validate robustness. The methods used included inverse variance weighted (IVW) analysis, false discovery rate (FDR), Cochran's Q test, I² statistic, MR-Egger regression, MR-PRESSO, leave-one-out method, co-localization analysis, and Steiger filtering test. Then, the multi-omic MR results were integrated and three tiers of genes were identified. Further, the tier 1 genes were chosen to perform drug prediction in DSigDB and molecular docking analyses with Autodock Vina. Lastly, the effects of the selected genes and drugs in HS were validated at both the tissue and cellular levels.
Results:
Through integrating multi-omics data, we identified one tier 1 gene (GLB1), twelve tier 2 genes (including DAPK2, AP4E1, ARSA, CTSF, MSH6, NEDD4, PDK1, PELI3, RB1, UNC13D, CTSC, and GZMB), and two tier 3 genes (NOS3 and ITGA6), all of which show varying associations with HS. Particularly, the GLB1(cg05120113) was causal associated with HS risk in DNA methylation (OR=1.0972, 95 % CI: 1.0532-1.1430, FDR=0.0163), gene expression (OR=1.2923, 95 % CI: 1.1816-1.4135, FDR<0.001) and protein abundance (OR=1.5430, 95 % CI: 1.3296-1.7905, FDR<0.001). The candidate drugs for GLB1 included Fulvestrant (adjusted P = 0.046, Affinity=-8.8 kcal/mol) and Cyperquat (adjusted P = 0.036, Affinity=-6.2 kcal/mol). Further, the GLB1 expression and inhibitory effect of Fulvestrant were validated in HS tissues and HSFs. Additionally, significant changes in the mRNA and protein expression levels of fibrosis-related markers, including TGF-β1 and α-SMA, were observed in HSFs.
Findings:
This study provides robust evidence for the causal involvement of PCD genes in HS formation and identified GLB1 along with 14 other potential genes. Fulvestrant demonstrated therapeutic potential for HS by modulating fibrosis-related pathways in fibroblasts.
Related Concept Videos
Intracellular Signaling Affects Focal Adhesions
Some...
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
The Intrinsic Apoptotic Pathway
Clinical Applications of Epidermal Stem Cells
Overview of Cell-Matrix Interactions
MAPK Signaling Cascades

