Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 23, 2011
Clinical implications of expanded carrier screening for pregnancy-related care and individual health
Laura C Gemmell1, Anjali Jotwani2, Jessica Giordano3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/Columbia University Fertility Center, New York, New York.
Objective:
To evaluate the incidence of expanded carrier screening (ECS) results with possible clinical implications on patient health and/or pregnancy-related treatment planning.
Design:
Single academic center, retrospective, cohort study.
Subjects:
A total of 3,136 patients underwent ECS between January 2018 and December 2020.
Exposure:
All patients were screened using the same ECS, comprising 283 genes.
Main Outcome Measures:
Rates of positive ECS results and carrier-carrier couples were reported, excluding carrier-carrier couples without a reproductive risk for a serious clinical outcome (i.e., alpha thalassemia single-gene deletions). Results with possible ramifications for an individual patient's health were recorded. This included individuals identified through ECS to be potentially affected with a genetic condition due to homozygous or compound heterozygous findings, and those with heterozygous findings associated with a personal health risk, such as elevated risk for premature ovarian insufficiency, metabolic crisis, neurological disease, cardiovascular disease, or malignancy.
Results:
Expanded carrier screening was performed and resulted in 3,136 patients; 2,280 (72.7%) carried at least one condition. Fifty-four patients (1.7%) were homozygous or compound heterozygous for a recessive genetic condition. Another 68 patients (2.2%) were high-risk heterozygote carriers of a recessive disease: Gaucher (n = 34), familial hypercholesterolemia (n = 14), fumarase deficiency (n = 9), ataxia-telangiectasia (n = 7), and fragile X premutation (n = 4). Ten female carriers of X-linked conditions were identified (0.4%). When restricting analysis to couples who both completed ECS (n = 905 couples), 58 couples (6.4%) carried the same genetic condition, although only 21 (2.3%) were considered clinically significant disease-causing combinations and recommended for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions.
Conclusion:
A small proportion (1.7%) of total ECS results impact clinical fertility care by triggering recommendations for in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions. A larger proportion of results (3.9%) had implications for patients' personal health, which may not be sufficiently addressed in the consent process and can affect eligibility for benefits such as life and disability insurance.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...

