Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

03:14
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
681
Intelligent Head and Neck CTA Report Quality Detection with Large Language Models
Liping Tian1,2, Yao Lu1,2, Xiaolu Fei3
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, China.
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
|August 27, 2025
Summary
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 can accurately detect errors in head and neck CT angiography (CTA) reports, significantly improving radiology quality control efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- Radiological report quality control is crucial for patient safety and effective diagnosis.
- Automating error detection in radiological reports can enhance efficiency and accuracy.
- Large language models (LLMs) show promise in analyzing medical text.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of GPT-4, ERNIE Bot, and SparkDesk in identifying common errors in head and neck CT angiography (CTA) reports.
- To assess the potential of LLMs in supporting quality control processes for Chinese radiological reports.
- To compare the efficiency and accuracy of LLMs against manual review for report quality assessment.
Main Methods:
- Collected 15,000 head and neck CTA reports from two datasets.
- Identified six common error types and developed LLM-based detection methods.
- Assessed report quality using a 5-point Likert scale and statistical tests (Wilcoxon rank-sum, Friedman, ICC, ANOVA).
- Evaluated model performance using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score.
Main Results:
- LLMs achieved over 95% detection accuracy for six common error types in Dataset 2.
- Error detection rates were lower in final reports compared to preliminary reports.
- GPT-4 demonstrated moderate consistency with manual scores (ICC=0.517), while ERNIE Bot and SparkDesk showed slightly lower consistency.
- LLMs evaluated reports significantly faster than human reviewers.
Conclusions:
- LLMs can effectively identify error types and differentiate report quality in head and neck CTA reports.
- These models offer a significant improvement in the efficiency of quality control reviews.
- LLMs hold substantial research and practical value for enhancing radiological report quality assurance.

