Clinical and Molecular Differences Suggest Different Responses to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in

Imran Nizamuddin1, Tarik Demir2, Katrina Dobinda3

  • 1Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Cancers
|August 28, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Predictors of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced solid tumors were identified. Patients without liver metastasis and with TERT mutations showed better outcomes, while MYC pathway and MLL2 mutations indicated poorer responses.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunotherapy
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Identifying predictors of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is crucial for optimizing cancer treatment.
  • Tumor mutational burden (TMB) ≥ 10 mut/Mb is a known factor, but further predictors are needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify clinical and genetic predictors of response to ICIs in advanced solid tumors with high TMB.
  • To correlate specific gene mutations and clinical factors with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 117 patients with advanced solid tumors treated with ICIs alone.
  • Kaplan-Meier method for PFS and OS; log-rank test for group comparisons.
  • Univariable analyses using Wilcoxon rank sum, chi-squared, and Fisher's exact tests for clinical and genetic variables.

Main Results:

  • Overall response rate was 34% (14% complete response). Median PFS was 8.05 months and OS was 26.8 months.
  • Higher PFS associated with ICI-sensitive tumors, absence of liver metastasis, and no prior systemic treatment.
  • In non-ICI-sensitive patients, TMB ≥ 15 mut/Mb improved outcomes. TERT mutations predicted better response; MYC pathway and MLL2 mutations predicted poorer response.

Conclusions:

  • Absence of liver metastasis, TERT mutations, and high TMB (≥15 mut/Mb) are associated with superior ICI response.
  • MYC pathway and MLL2 gene mutations are linked to worse ICI response in advanced solid tumors.

Related Concept Videos

Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell02:21

Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell

Cancer arises from mutations in the critical genes that allow healthy cells to escape cell cycle regulation and acquire the ability to proliferate indefinitely. Though originating from a single mutation event in one of the originator cells, cancer progresses when the mutant cell lines continue to gain more and more mutations, and finally, become malignant. For example, chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) develops initially as a non-lethal increase in white blood cells, which progressively...
15.7K
Tumor Progression02:07

Tumor Progression

Tumor progression is a phenomenon where the pre-formed tumor acquires successive mutations to become clinically more aggressive and malignant. In the 1950s, Foulds first described the stepwise progression of cancer cells through successive stages.
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
8.0K
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
7.2K