Early-Onset Versus Late-Onset Preeclampsia in Bogotá, Colombia: Differential Risk Factor Identification and

Ayala-Ramírez Paola1,2, Mennickent Daniela3,4, Farkas Carlos3

  • 1Human Genetics Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá 110231, Colombia.

Biomedicines
|August 28, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Early-onset preeclampsia (EOP) and late-onset preeclampsia (LOP) have distinct risk factors in Colombian women. Machine learning models identified education and hypertension history as key predictors for EOP.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Perinatal Medicine
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Preeclampsia (PE) is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries.
  • Early-onset PE (EOP) and late-onset PE (LOP) represent distinct clinical conditions with different underlying mechanisms.
  • Limited research exists on differential risk factors for EOP and LOP in Latin American populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and evaluate clinical risk factors for predicting EOP and LOP.
  • To compare traditional statistical methods with machine learning (ML) for PE subtype prediction.
  • To develop context-specific prenatal care strategies for pregnant women in Bogotá, Colombia.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional observational study of 190 pregnant women with PE (80 EOP, 110 LOP) in Bogotá.
  • Data collection via structured interviews and clinical records, including risk factors and perinatal outcomes.
  • Application of traditional statistics and eleven ML techniques for predictive modeling and feature importance analysis.

Main Results:

  • EOP was associated with higher maternal education and hypertension history; LOP with allergic history.
  • Linear discriminant analysis achieved the highest recall (0.71) for PE subtype prediction.
  • Key predictors identified by ML included education level, family history of perinatal death, and hypertension history.

Conclusions:

  • EOP and LOP present with unique clinical profiles in this Colombian cohort.
  • Integrating traditional statistics with ML enhances early risk stratification for PE subtypes.
  • Findings support the development of tailored prenatal care strategies in similar healthcare settings.

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
530
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.5K
Steps in Outbreak Investigation01:18

Steps in Outbreak Investigation

In the ever-evolving field of public health, statistical analysis serves as a cornerstone for understanding and managing disease outbreaks. By leveraging various statistical tools, health professionals can predict potential outbreaks, analyze ongoing situations, and devise effective responses to mitigate impact. For that to happen, there are a few possible stages of the analysis:
188
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
671
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
280
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure01:10

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the...
626