Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Home-Based Prescribed Pulmonary Exercise in Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published on: August 24, 2019
Physical Training and Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and
Saray Ríos Murillo1, Angie Melissa Hinestroza Mancilla1, Lina Manuela Pérez Ordoñez1
1Grupo de Investigación en Salud Integral (GISI), Department of Health Sciences Faculty, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali 760035, Colombia.
Background/Objectives:
Physical training and Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials. Pulmonary rehabilitation and physical training are essential components of the comprehensive management of patients with cystic fibrosis. Despite documented benefits for some clinical outcomes, uncertainty exists regarding their overall effects. Therefore, the objective of the present meta-analysis is to determine the effectiveness of physical training and pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with CF.
Methods:
This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials published between 1990 and 2025 was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Clinical Trial, SCOPUS, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scielo, and LILAC databases. The risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB 2 tool, the quality of the evidence with the Jadad scale, and the certainty of the evidence for each outcome was assessed according to GRADE guidelines. This meta-analysis was developed using the statistical packages RevMan 5.4® and Jamovi 2.3.28®.
Results:
Twenty-three studies with a total of 800 patients with CF were included. This meta-analysis showed that pulmonary rehabilitation and physical training did not affect pulmonary function, as observed in FEV1 (SMD: 0.05; 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.20; p = 0.46) and FVC (SMD: 0.11; 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.27; p = 0.14). However, it has a discrete impact on exercise capacity, producing an increase in VO2 max (MD: 2.74; 95% CI: 0.43 to 5.04; p = 0.02). Subgroup analyses did not yield relevant findings, and sensitivity analyses did not produce modifications in the direction or magnitude of the effect.
Conclusions:
The intervention evaluated in this meta-analysis does not have effects on pulmonary function but may influence exercise capacity, particularly VO2 max. It is recommended to interpret the findings with caution due to the limited certainty of the available evidence.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cystic Fibrosis: Management
Sinus disease and chronic...
Chest Physiotherapy
Purpose
CPT is primarily used for patients with excessive bronchial secretions who have difficulty clearing...
Cystic Fibrosis: Pathogenesis
CF is primarily caused by a genetic mutation in a chromosome 7 gene coding for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. The most common gene mutation leading to CF is the ΔF508 mutation,...
Pulmonary Function Tests
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History

