The TAVI Dilemma: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve-Interpreting Current Evidence for...

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has transformed the treatment of aortic valve stenosis, offering a less invasive alternative to surgical valve replacement, particularly in elderly and high-risk populations. As TAVI expands into younger, lower-risk patients, the choice of transcatheter heart valve has become increasingly important to optimize both immediate and long-term outcomes. Currently, Self-Expandable Valves (SEVs) and Balloon-Expandable Valves (BEVs) are the two most widely used platforms, each characterized by distinct design features, implantation techniques, and hemodynamic profiles. While no definitive evidence supports the overall superiority of one valve type over the other, accumulating clinical data highlight specific advantages and limitations depending on anatomical and procedural contexts. This review aims to present and critically discuss the current evidence, clinical considerations, and evolving concerns surrounding the use of SEVs versus BEVs, with a particular focus on challenging scenarios such as valve-in-valve procedures and long-term valve strategy planning.