Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Coronary Artery Revascularization
Published on: September 15, 2023
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery
Szymon Jonik1, Karolina Gumiężna1, Piotr Baruś1
11st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a Str., 01-267 Warsaw, Poland.
Insights
For left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease, 5-year outcomes show similar overall mortality between coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CABG had more strokes, while PCI had more myocardial infarctions and repeat revascularizations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
Background:
- Optimal revascularization for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease remains debated, with limited real-world data.
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide evidence, but clinical practice outcomes require further investigation.
- This study evaluates 5-year outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) involving LMCA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare 5-year clinical outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for LMCA disease.
- To assess overall mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and repeat revascularization (RR).
- To analyze real-world data from patients treated according to Heart Team (HT) recommendations.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 267 patients with MVD involving LMCA disease.
- Patients were treated with either CABG (109 patients) or PCI (158 patients) between 2016-2019.
- Outcomes assessed included all-cause mortality, MACCE, MI, stroke, and RR at 5-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in 5-year overall mortality between CABG and PCI groups (22.9% vs. 24.7%, p=0.74).
- Higher rates of myocardial infarction (MI) in the PCI group (15.8% vs. 7.3%, p=0.04).
- Higher rates of stroke in the CABG group (11.0% vs. 3.8%, p=0.02).
- Higher MACCE rates in the PCI group (77.2% vs. 55.0%, p<0.001), driven by significantly higher rates of repeat revascularization (RR) (32.9% vs. 13.8%, p<0.001).
Conclusions:
- In real-world practice, neither CABG nor PCI demonstrated overwhelming superiority for LMCA disease management.
- CABG was associated with higher stroke rates, while PCI led to more MIs and repeat revascularizations.
- Heart Team decisions guide treatment, with similar long-term survival but differing event profiles between revascularization strategies.
Abstract:
Background: The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease has been repeatedly addressed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), although outcomes from real-life clinical studies are still poorly investigated. Objectives: This retrospective study aimed to assess the complete 5-year outcomes for individuals with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) involving LMCA disease treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as recommended by a local HT. Methods: From 2016 to 2019, 176 Heart Team (HT) meetings were held. Primary and secondary endpoints of 267 patients with MVD involving LMCA disease qualified either for CABG or PCI (109 and 158 patients, respectively) with subsequent optimal medical therapy (OMT) were assessed. The primary endpoint of the study was as an overall mortality, while secondary endpoints contained major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)-specifically, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization (RR), and the individual components of MACCE. Results: At 5 years, we found no significant difference in overall mortality between the both cohorts (22.9%-CABG vs. 24.7%-PCI, p = 0.74). The rate of MI was higher in patients treated percutaneously (7.3% vs. 15.8% for PCI, p = 0.04), while the incidence of stroke was higher in patients who underwent CABG (3.8% vs. 11.0% for CABG, p = 0.02). A MACCE occurrence was higher in PCI cohort (77.2% vs. 55.0%, p < 0.001), mainly driven by higher rates of RR was higher in patients treated percutaneously (32.9% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: For patients with LMCA disease, neither CABG nor PCI following HT decisions showed overwhelming superiority in real-life clinical practice: occurrence of all-cause death was similar, rates of MACCE, MI, and repeat revascularization advocated CABG, while incidence of strokes favored PCI.
More Related Videos
13:10Direct Re-implantation of Left Coronary Artery into the Aorta in Adults with Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery ALCAPA
Published on: April 24, 2017
09:12Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management