Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating the sensitivity of a screening test.

N E Day

    Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
    |December 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    A common method for estimating screening test sensitivity is flawed. A new, simpler method using only incidence rates is proposed for more accurate sensitivity assessment.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Linoleic acid, a dietary n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid, and the aetiology of ulcerative colitis: a nested case-control study within a European prospective cohort study.

    Gut·2009
    Same author

    Quantitative analysis of DNA methylation after whole bisulfitome amplification of a minute amount of DNA from body fluids.

    Epigenetics·2009
    Same author

    Prospective association between emotional health and clinical evidence of Parkinson's disease.

    European journal of neurology·2008
    Same author

    Meat intake and bladder cancer in a prospective study: a role for heterocyclic aromatic amines?

    Cancer causes & control : CCC·2008
    Same author

    A case-control study of the impact of the East Anglian breast screening programme on breast cancer mortality.

    British journal of cancer·2007
    Same author

    Differential leucocyte count and the risk of future coronary artery disease in healthy men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study.

    Journal of internal medicine·2007
    Same journal

    Comparative social costs of six early years disadvantages: a birth cohort microsimulation study.

    Journal of epidemiology and community health·2026
    Same journal

    Sociodemographic inequalities in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) novel treatments: a national population-based cohort study.

    Journal of epidemiology and community health·2026
    Same journal

    Secular trends in primary care utilisation for mental health problems: a Norwegian register-based population-wide study.

    Journal of epidemiology and community health·2026
    Same journal

    Guide to recent advances in difference-in-differences methodology for population health studies.

    Journal of epidemiology and community health·2026
    Same journal

    From early to fewer first births: ADHD and family formation among young adults.

    Journal of epidemiology and community health·2026
    Same journal

    10-year mortality among first-time mothers involved in family court care proceedings in England: cohort study using linked administrative hospital, mortality and family court records.

    Journal of epidemiology and community health·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical screening test evaluation
    • Epidemiological methods

    Background:

    • Estimating screening test sensitivity is crucial for public health.
    • Current methods rely on prevalence and interval cancer data, which can be problematic.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify logical and quantitative flaws in a common sensitivity estimation method.
    • To propose a new, more robust method for estimating screening test sensitivity.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of the logical soundness of the existing sensitivity estimation formula.
    • Development of an alternative estimation method based solely on incidence rates.

    Main Results:

    • The commonly used sensitivity estimate is demonstrated to be logically unsound.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The proposed alternative estimate shows improved quantitative performance.

    • Conclusions:

    • The traditional method for estimating screening test sensitivity is unreliable.
    • A new, incidence-rate-based method offers a more accurate approach to sensitivity estimation.