Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

An In vitro System to Gauge the Thrombolytic Efficacy of Histotripsy and a Lytic Drug
Published on: June 4, 2021
Interventional Procedures in Deep Venous Thrombosis Treatment: A Review of Techniques, Outcomes, and Patient
Arkadiusz Kacała1, Mateusz Dorochowicz2, Jędrzej Fischer3
1Department of General, Interventional and Neuroradiology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland.
Insights
Interventional treatments for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) improve vein patency and reduce post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in select patients. Modern techniques offer efficient clot removal and improved safety, but further research is needed.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Radiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Background:
- Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) can lead to pulmonary embolism and chronic post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS).
- Anticoagulation manages thrombus extension but does not resolve existing clots.
- Interventional techniques aim to restore venous patency and mitigate DVT complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the evidence on outcomes, safety, and patient selection for interventional DVT procedures.
- To summarize findings from randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and observational studies.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of major databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science) from January 2000 to February 2024.
- Inclusion of RCTs, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and observational studies (≥20 patients).
- Assessment of technical success, thrombus clearance, venous patency, PTS, quality of life, and complications, with risk of bias evaluation.
Main Results:
- Randomized trials indicate catheter-directed and pharmacomechanical approaches improve patency and reduce moderate-to-severe PTS in iliofemoral DVT.
- Mechanical thrombectomy devices show high thrombus clearance and shorter procedure times.
- Venous stenting demonstrates 74-89% patency rates at 12 months in observational data.
Conclusions:
- Interventional procedures can improve outcomes and reduce PTS in carefully selected patients, especially with acute iliofemoral DVT.
- Modern mechanical and pharmacomechanical methods enhance efficiency and safety.
- Venous stenting addresses underlying venous obstructions, but more high-quality trials are needed for optimal selection and comparative effectiveness.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is associated with pulmonary embolism and long-term complications such as post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Anticoagulation prevents thrombus extension but does not actively remove clot. Interventional techniques, including catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy, and venous stenting, have been introduced to restore venous patency and reduce complications. This systematic review summarizes current evidence on outcomes, safety, and patient selection for these procedures. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and February 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and observational studies with ≥20 patients. Extracted outcomes were technical success, thrombus clearance, venous patency, PTS, quality of life, and complications. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and AMSTAR-2. Results: Of 456 records screened, 35 studies were included. Randomized trials (CaVenT, ATTRACT, CAVA) showed that catheter-directed and pharmacomechanical approaches improved venous patency and reduced moderate-to-severe PTS in selected patients with iliofemoral DVT, though overall benefit was variable. Mechanical thrombectomy devices (e.g., AngioJet, ClotTriever, FlowTriever) achieved high thrombus clearance and shorter procedural times, with device-specific complication profiles. Observational data demonstrated venous stenting patency rates of 74-89% at 12 months. Study heterogeneity limited direct comparisons. Conclusions: Interventional procedures can reduce PTS and improve outcomes in carefully selected patients, particularly those with acute iliofemoral DVT. Modern mechanical and pharmacomechanical techniques enhance efficiency and safety, while venous stenting addresses underlying obstructions. Further high-quality trials with long-term follow-up are needed to define optimal patient selection and comparative effectiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

