Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
Assessment of Sonication for Diagnosing Implant-Associated Infections in Spinal Surgery Routine Practice
Estibaliz Torrecilla-Sádaba1, Santiago Gabardo2, Ignacio Mahillo-Fernández3
1Department of Clinical Microbiology, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Díaz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Abstract:
Infections following spinal surgery can result in potentially devastating complications. An accurate microbiological diagnosis is crucial for proper treatment. Sonication is a diagnostic method that can be beneficial in patients with acute or low-grade infections. This study aimed to assess the sensitivity and effectiveness of sonication as a method for diagnosing spinal implant infections in cases of both suspected and unsuspected infections during spinal surgical revision. We conducted a retrospective observational study that included all patients who underwent revision spinal surgery between March 2011 and October 2022. We collected the implants and surrounding tissues from these patients for microbiological analysis. The implant sonication was performed according to a previously published protocol. Patients were categorised into those undergoing surgical revision for suspected spinal implant infection (SSII) and those for non-suspected spinal implant infection (NSSII). We collected comprehensive patient data, including demographics, risk factors, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), surgical details, microbiological findings, antibiotic regimens, and clinical outcomes. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were conducted on both sonicated and non-sonicated samples. A total of 158 patients met the inclusion criteria; 51 of them were diagnosed with infection during surgery revision. Patients with SSII had higher CCIs than those with NSSII. The sensitivity was significantly higher in sonicated samples (68.6%; 95% CI: 55.9-81.4%) than in non-sonicated samples (42%; 95% CI: 28.3-55.7%). The specificities were similar, with sonicated samples at 93.5% (95% CI: 88.8-98.1%) and non-sonicated samples at 99.05% (95% CI: 97.2-100.9%). Combining both methods resulted in sensitivity and specificity rates of 76% (95% CI: 64.2-87.8%) and 93.3% (95% CI: 88.2-98.1%), respectively. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was common in SSII, whereas Cutibacterium acnes and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) were predominant in NSSII. This study supports the routine use of implant sonication as a valuable supplementary method for peri-implant tissue cultures, especially for identifying low-grade spinal implant infections.
Insights
Routine implant sonication significantly improves the detection of spinal implant infections, especially low-grade cases. This diagnostic method enhances sensitivity when combined with traditional cultures for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Infectious Diseases
- Surgical Microbiology
Background:
- Spinal surgery infections pose severe complications, necessitating accurate microbiological diagnosis for effective treatment.
- Sonication is a diagnostic technique with potential benefits for identifying acute or low-grade infections.
- Assessing sonication's efficacy in diagnosing spinal implant infections during revision surgery is critical.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the sensitivity and effectiveness of implant sonication for diagnosing spinal implant infections.
- To compare sonication's diagnostic performance in suspected (SSII) versus non-suspected (NSSII) spinal implant infections.
- To determine the optimal use of sonication as a supplementary diagnostic tool in spinal surgery revisions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective observational study of 158 patients undergoing revision spinal surgery (March 2011 - October 2022).
- Microbiological analysis of explanted implants and surrounding tissues using sonication and conventional cultures.
- Sensitivity and specificity analyses comparing sonicated and non-sonicated sample results.
Main Results:
- Sonication significantly increased diagnostic sensitivity (68.6%) compared to non-sonicated samples (42%).
- Specificities were high for both methods (sonicated: 93.5%, non-sonicated: 99.05%), with combined methods yielding 76% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity.
- Common pathogens included MSSA in SSII, and C. acnes/CNS in NSSII.
Conclusions:
- Implant sonication is a valuable adjunctive method for diagnosing spinal implant infections, particularly low-grade cases.
- Routine use of sonication alongside peri-implant tissue cultures can improve microbiological diagnosis accuracy.
- This approach aids in guiding appropriate antibiotic therapy and improving clinical outcomes post-spinal surgery.

