Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Aggregates Classification01:29

Aggregates Classification

Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Methods of Classification and Identification01:28

Methods of Classification and Identification

Bacterial identification relies on a diverse array of techniques to classify and understand microorganisms, each tailored to uncover specific characteristics. Traditional morphological approaches, while still valuable, are limited for closely related or structurally simple organisms. Modern methods integrate biochemical, serological, genetic, and advanced molecular tools to achieve greater accuracy.Morphological and Biochemical TechniquesMorphological characteristics, such as cell shape and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of the flexural strength and microstructure of 3D printed and milled mono- and multilayer zirconia.

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials·2026
Same author

Prevalence and determinants of vascular aging in Austria - a holistic view: the LEAD study.

Journal of hypertension·2026
Same author

Synching with seasonality: Predicting roe deer parturition phenology across its distributional range.

The Journal of animal ecology·2025
Same author

Enhancing Reliability in Redundant Homogeneous Sensor Arrays with Self-X and Multidimensional Mapping.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Matching the green wave: growing season length determines embryonic diapause in roe deer.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

The timing and spatial distribution of mother-offspring interactions in an obligate hider.

Movement ecology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 19, 2026

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors
05:16

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Published on: October 15, 2014

25.3K

A Comparative Study of Hybrid Machine-Learning vs. Deep-Learning Approaches for Varroa Mite Detection and Counting.

Amira Ghezal1, Andreas König1

  • 1Lehrstuhl Kognitive Integrierte Sensorsysteme, Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 28, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Traditional machine learning (ML) methods outperform deep learning (DL) for detecting Varroa destructor mites in hyperspectral images, especially in resource-limited settings. ML offers faster processing and comparable accuracy for bee health monitoring.

Keywords:
Varroa mite detectiondeep learninghyperspectral imagingmachine learningmodel comparison

More Related Videos

SwarmSight: Real-time Tracking of Insect Antenna Movements and Proboscis Extension Reflex Using a Common Preparation and Conventional Hardware
08:13

SwarmSight: Real-time Tracking of Insect Antenna Movements and Proboscis Extension Reflex Using a Common Preparation and Conventional Hardware

Published on: December 25, 2017

8.3K
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 19, 2026

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors
05:16

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Published on: October 15, 2014

25.3K
SwarmSight: Real-time Tracking of Insect Antenna Movements and Proboscis Extension Reflex Using a Common Preparation and Conventional Hardware
08:13

SwarmSight: Real-time Tracking of Insect Antenna Movements and Proboscis Extension Reflex Using a Common Preparation and Conventional Hardware

Published on: December 25, 2017

8.3K
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Agricultural Science
  • Computer Science
  • Entomology

Background:

  • Varroa destructor mites are a significant threat to honeybee colonies worldwide.
  • Accurate and efficient detection of these mites is crucial for effective pest management and preserving bee health.
  • Hyperspectral imaging offers a promising non-invasive method for mite detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comparatively evaluate traditional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches for detecting and counting Varroa destructor mites.
  • To assess the performance of ML and DL models using hyperspectral images under varying data conditions.
  • To provide practical guidance on selecting appropriate mite detection strategies based on resource availability and performance requirements.

Main Methods:

  • A traditional ML pipeline using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) was implemented.
  • A deep learning (DL) approach utilizing Faster R-CNN with ResNet-50 and ResNet-101 backbones was fine-tuned on the same dataset.
  • Both methods were evaluated on hyperspectral images for mite detection and counting accuracy.

Main Results:

  • The ML pipeline achieved high performance (precision = 0.9983, recall = 0.9947) with rapid training and inference on CPU.
  • The DL models (ResNet-50/101) achieved lower precision (0.966/0.971) and recall (0.757/0.829) despite requiring GPU acceleration and longer training times.
  • ML demonstrated superior robustness under limited-data conditions compared to DL.

Conclusions:

  • Traditional ML methods are more suitable for Varroa destructor mite detection in hyperspectral images within resource-constrained environments.
  • DL approaches, while powerful, present challenges in training time, computational resources, and reproducibility for this specific application.
  • The study provides valuable insights for selecting optimal mite detection strategies in apiculture, balancing performance with practical implementation.