Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging parameters in type II TIC breast lesions
Jimei Jiang1, Weibin Ma1, Ming Li1
1Department of Radiology, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Background:
In dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (DCE-T1WI) of breast lesions, type III time-intensity curves (TICs) are associated with malignant lesions, and type I TICs are associated with benign lesions, but the association of type II curves with the status of breast lesions remains controversial. This study aimed to analyze the semi-quantitative parameters derived from DCE-T1WI in patients with type II TIC breast lesions and to develop a nomogram for the benign/malignant classification of lesions with type II TICs.
Methods:
Data of patients with type II TIC breast lesions were retrospectively collected. The following semi-quantitative parameters were collected: signal intensity of pre-contrast (SIpre), peak signal intensity (SIp), signal intensity of wash-in (SIwi), slope of peak (Sp), slope of wash-in (Swi), time to peak (Tp), time of wash-in (Twi), enhancement rate of peak (ERp), and enhancement rate of wash-in (ERwi). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to select useful clinical and DCE-T1WI features. Selected features were used for nomogram model development. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were used for model performance evaluation.
Results:
Ninety-eight female patients with type II TIC breast lesions were included (53 with malignant lesions). After univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, only Tp showed an odds ratio of 0.95 (p = 0.014, 95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.97). A nomogram was constructed and included Swi, SIp, SIwi, SIpre, Tp, ERp, and Sp. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of the nomogram were 0.827, 0.761, 0.795, 0.796, and 0.796, respectively. The AUC was 0.862.
Conclusion:
DCE-T1WI semi-quantitative parameters were different among benign and malignant lesions in patients with type II TIC lesions. Tp showed the most significant difference after a multivariable logistic regression analysis. The results suggest that DCE-T1WI semi-quantitative parameters can be used to predict malignant lesions in patients with type II TIC.
More Related Videos
08:56Terahertz Imaging and Characterization Protocol for Freshly Excised Breast Cancer Tumors
Published on: April 5, 2020
09:32Time-Resolved, Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography for Characterization of Aortic Endoleaks and Treatment Guidance via 2D-3D Fusion-Imaging
Published on: December 9, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging