Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Macro-Level Factors Influencing the Adoption and Early Implementation of Clinical Ethics Support Services: A Scoping
Gilles Bernard1, Michael Fischer2
1UMIT TIROL - Private University of Health Sciences and Health Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria. gilles.bernard@edu.umit-tirol.at.
Abstract:
Clinical ethics are becoming increasingly important in the twenty-first century. Value-laden cases and moral dilemmas in healthcare have led to the creation of clinical ethics support structures. The last decades have shown their implementation in hospitals around the globe. Recent literature investigates their value, function, and integration. Many conclude that they do valuable work yet remain inadequately integrated, lack institutionalization, and struggle with resource shortages. To gain an understanding of this development and pave the way for future implementation and research, a scoping review was chosen to determine which macro-level factors currently influence the heterogeneous approaches. This review used the scientific research databases Medline and CINAHL in April 2025. It included studies, opinion papers, and book chapters in English and German offering explanations, analysis, discussion, and examples of macro-level clinical ethics support structures' adoption and implementation influences. An inductive qualitative content analysis was conducted to extract the desired information. The resulting categories were formatted into an overview frame. The literature search yielded 400 publications, full-text analysis and snowball search resulted in 47 eligible for analysis. Eight main factors with respective subcategories were identified. These vary in their degree of binding authority, ranging from clearly defined regulations, such as national laws, to more ambiguous influences, such as public opinion and advocacy. Further insights reveal that the effectiveness of these factors cannot yet be determined, and their influence may vary based on the values and political context of the country where a support structure is implemented.
More Related Videos
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Nursing Ethical Principles I
Autonomy
Autonomy underscores the significance of a patient's self-determination and freedom from external control. In healthcare, respecting...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...