Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
General Practitioner Coordinated Multidisciplinary Care Improves Long-Term Survival following Stroke with Variation
Nadine E Andrew1,2, David Ung3,4, Monique F Kilkenny5,6
1Department of Medicine, Peninsula Clinical School, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, nadine.andrew@monash.edu.
None:
Background: Australian Medicare funded policies to support General Practtitioners (GPs) to coordinate multidisciplinary care (MDC) with other healthcare providers have potential to benefit survivors of stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA). However, the effectiveness of these policies is unknown. We aimed to determine the population effect of such policies in improving long-term outcomes following stroke/TIA, by impairment grouping.
Methods:
Target trial emulation using observational data within a cohort of community-dwelling adults with stroke/TIA from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (January 2012-December 2016, 42 hospitals). Person-level Medicare, pharmacy, aged care, death, and hospital records were linked. The exposure was ≥1 Medicare GP-MDC claim 6-18 months post-stroke. Outcomes were survival and hospitalisations at 19-30 months. Impairment group (minimal, moderate, severe) was classified by latent class analysis of EQ-5D-3L questionnaire data obtained 90-180 days post-stroke. Analysis comprised multivariable, multilevel survival analysis with inverse probability treatment weights (42 covariates).
Results:
The cohort comprised 7,255 people with stroke (42% female, median age 71 years, 24% TIA, impairment: 39% minimal, 32% moderate, 29% severe, 29% had a MDC claim). More claims occurred with each increasing level of impairment group: minimal 22%; moderate 30%; severe 37%. Twelve-month mortality was reduced in those with ≥1 MDC claim (compared to those without) in the minimal (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.91) and severe (aHR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.91) impairment groups, but not in the moderate group (aHR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.99). Compared to those without a claim, hospital presentations were greater in the minimal (aHR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.59) and moderate impairment groups (aHR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.60) but not the severe group (aHR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.30).
Conclusions:
Government policy incentives for GP-coordinated MDC were effective at the population level at improving long-term survival outcomes, in those with minimal and severe impairments.
.More Related Videos
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Regulation of Stroke Volume
Preload refers to the degree of stretch on the heart before it contracts. It's analogous to the stretching of a rubber band; the more it's stretched, the more forcefully it snaps back. This concept is encapsulated in the Frank-Starling law of the...