Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Acupoint Application Combined with Acupressure as an Adjunctive Therapy for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting
Published on: June 21, 2024
Palonosetron Plus Megestrol Acetate Versus Palonosetron Plus Dexamethasone in Preventing Moderately Emetogenic
Qiaoqi Li1, Yingzhe Luo2, Yaqin Zhao1
1Division of Abdominal Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center (Q.L., Y.Z., B.Y., C.Y.), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Backgrounds:
Evidence shows that megestrol acetate (MA) is a potential antiemetic for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). No persuasive clinical trials have been performed to validate the efficacy and safety of MA. Here we designed a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of palonosetron plus MA versus palonosetron plus dexamethasone (DEX) in preventing CINV following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) regimens.
Methods:
This was a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, crossover, clinical trial practiced in three medical centers. The eligible patients were recruited to the DEX-MA and MA-DEX groups using a computer-generated random number table. Briefly, the DEX-MA group received palonosetron and DEX for the first chemotherapy cycle and then received palonosetron and MA for the second cycle. The MA-DEX group received the antiemetic treatment in the reverse order. Evaluating patients' efficacy and quality of life (QOL) with these two antiemetic regimens. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR). This trial has been registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR2000037447).
Results:
Ninety-two patients were enrolled between June 2020 and July 2023, and 86 were eventually evaluated in the study. Forty-one patients were randomized in the DEX-MA group and forty-five in the MA-DEX group. Of all subjects, 51.1% were male, and 48.9% were female. complete response (CR) rates showed no significant difference in the acute phase (0-24 h) (DEX vs. MA, 81.4% vs. 82.6%, P = 0.843), delayed phase (24-120 h) (DEX vs. MA, 81.4% vs. 82.6%, P = 0.843), or overall phase (DEX vs. MA, 72.1% vs. 73.3%, P = 0.864). The QOL showed significant differences in dyspnea symptoms (P = 0.002) and appetite loss symptoms (P = 0.039). This result implied that MA led to less dyspnea, appetite loss, and a better QOL after chemotherapy.
Conclusions:
MA may have equivalent efficacy to DEX in the prevention of moderately emetogenic regimen CINV, and no obvious side events occurred. Compared with DEX, MA can significantly improve QOL, especially in decreasing dyspnea and appetite loss. An extension phase III study is going on to validate this observation.
More Related Videos
05:33Author Spotlight: Alleviating Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy with Safe and Effective Auricular Acupuncture
Published on: August 4, 2023
08:57Sample Extraction and Simultaneous Chromatographic Quantitation of Doxorubicin and Mitomycin C Following Drug Combination Delivery in Nanoparticles to Tumor-bearing Mice
Published on: October 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Phenothiazines, such as prochlorperazine...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Prostaglandin Analogs as Mucosal Protective Agents
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can induce peptic ulcers by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, decreasing...