Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Cost-effectiveness of a digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation programme for patients with coronary heart disease
Justin Braver1,2,3, Thomas H Marwick1,3, Melinda J Carrington1,3
1Baker Department of Cardiometabolic Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Insights
Digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation (DeCR) is a cost-effective strategy for coronary heart disease patients, improving health outcomes. This digital approach offers better quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at an acceptable cost compared to usual care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Digital Health
Background:
- Coronary heart disease (CHD) necessitates effective and accessible rehabilitation programs.
- Traditional cardiac rehabilitation may have limitations in reach and adherence.
- Digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation (DeCR) offers a potential solution for widespread patient access.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of a nationally implemented DeCR program for CHD patients.
- To compare the health outcomes and costs of DeCR versus usual care.
Main Methods:
- A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a Markov model.
- Data on hospitalization costs and intervention delivery were collected.
- Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were derived from EQ-5D-5L scores and literature estimates.
- A 5-year time horizon with 3% annual discounting was applied.
- Sensitivity analyses were conducted with a willingness-to-pay threshold of AUD$50,000 per QALY.
Main Results:
- DeCR yielded 4.677 QALYs at AUD$121,235, versus 3.244 QALYs at AUD$100,733 for usual care.
- The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was AUD$14,302 per QALY gained, below the WTP threshold.
- DeCR was found to be cost-effective in 87% of simulations.
Conclusions:
- Digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation is a cost-effective alternative to usual care for CHD patients.
- DeCR improves health outcomes, including QALYs, at an acceptable economic cost.
- The findings support the broader implementation of DeCR programs.
Aims:
This study aimed to explore the long-term cost-effectiveness of a nationally implemented, digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation (DeCR) programme for patients admitted for coronary heart disease (CHD).
Methods And Results:
We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis, using a Markov model to compare DeCR with usual care. Coronary heart disease patients were recruited nationally post-hospitalization into an 8-week DeCR programme comprising telehealth consultations and a mobile app. Index hospitalization and rehospitalization costs were sourced from private hospital administrative insurance claims, and intervention delivery was micro-costed. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were derived from EQ-5D-5L utility scores collected in the DeCR group and literature-based estimates for usual care. Costs and QALYS were modelled over a 5-year time horizon and discounted at 3% annually. Costs and QALYs were based on average values per patient, rather than being driven by sample sizes. Uncertainty was assessed using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of AUD$50 000 per QALY. Of the 337 patients (DeCR: 88; usual care: 249), most were male (73%), aged ≥65 years (70%) with multimorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 1: 61%). Digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation yielded 4.677 QALYs at a cost of AUD$121,235, compared with 3.244 QALYs at AUD$100 733 for usual care. The incremental cost of AUD$20 503 resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of AUD$14 302 (€9082) per QALY gained, well below the WTP threshold. Key ICER drivers included mortality risk, proportion of usual care attending cardiac rehabilitation, and DeCR utility gained. Digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation was cost-effective in 87% of simulations.
Conclusion:
Digitally enabled cardiac rehabilitation is a cost-effective alternative to usual care, offering improved health outcomes at an acceptable cost.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

