Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Rapid Point-of-Care Assay of Enoxaparin Anticoagulant Efficacy in Whole Blood
Published on: October 12, 2012
Laboratory risk management for INR alert values.
Oana Roxana Oprea1,2, Ana-Maria Fotache3, Corina-Maria Rus3
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142, Targu Mures, Romania. oana.oprea@umfst.ro.
High International Normalized Ratio (INR) alert values (>4.5) pose an unacceptable risk in clinical laboratories. This study highlights frequent occurrences and critical consequences, necessitating improved laboratory control measures for patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Laboratory Science
- Medical Diagnostics
- Patient Safety
Background:
- The International Normalized Ratio (INR) is crucial for monitoring vitamin K antagonist therapy.
- Efficient management of laboratory INR alert values is essential for optimal patient care.
- Evaluating risk levels associated with INR alert values is vital for quality improvement in clinical laboratories.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the risk levels of International Normalized Ratio (INR) alert values in a tertiary care hospital's laboratory.
- To compare observed INR alert value risks with established benchmarks.
- To identify underlying causes and failure modes contributing to INR alert values.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 42,799 plasma samples for INR values over a 12-month period (September 2023 - August 2024).
- Assessment of risk levels for INR values > 4.5 using a risk assessment matrix.
- Calculation of daily probability for INR alert value occurrence.
- Evaluation of the sample journey and documentation practices within the clinical laboratory.
Main Results:
- 347 out of 42,799 samples (0.81%) exhibited INR alert values (>4.5).
- INR alert values > 4.5 were classified as an unacceptable risk level due to high frequency (0.95 daily occurrence) and critical consequences.
- Potential failure modes included incomplete communication documentation and significant resampling delays (>6 hours in 30% of cases).
Conclusions:
- INR alert values > 4.5 represent a significant and unacceptable risk in the clinical laboratory setting.
- The study identified specific failure modes, such as documentation gaps and sample handling delays, that contribute to unacceptable INR values.
- Implementation of stringent control measures is recommended for laboratories to mitigate the risks associated with critical INR alert values.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

