Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of sync-atrioventricular versus nominal optimization in correlation with QRS
Gamela Nasr1, Aliaa Tarek Mahfouz2,3, Mostafa Wanees Ahmed El Husseny4,5
1Department of Cardiology, Faculty of medicine, Suez Canal university, Ismailia, Egypt.
Insights
The novel SyncAV algorithm significantly reduced QRS duration in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), improving clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. This device-based approach optimizes biventricular pacing for better heart failure management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is crucial for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction.
- Optimizing atrioventricular (AV) delay in CRT improves patient response.
- Novel algorithms aim to enhance CRT's effectiveness through automatic timing optimization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of the SyncAV algorithm for optimizing biventricular (BiV) pacing.
- To assess if SyncAV improves cardiac synchrony and acute hemodynamic response compared to nominal settings.
- To investigate the impact of SyncAV on QRS duration and clinical outcomes in CRT patients.
Main Methods:
- 36 patients with left bundle branch block undergoing CRT implantation were studied.
- Two pacing modes were compared: Nominal AV delay and SyncAV algorithm.
- Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data were collected at 1 and 6 months post-implantation.
Main Results:
- SyncAV significantly reduced QRS duration compared to nominal settings (P < 0.001).
- Improvements in clinical and echocardiographic parameters were observed with SyncAV.
- No QRS duration prolongation occurred in any patient using the SyncAV algorithm.
Conclusions:
- Patient-tailored BiV pacing using the SyncAV algorithm facilitates post-implant electrical optimization.
- The automatic device-based algorithm effectively adjusts to intrinsic atrioventricular timing.
- SyncAV offers a promising approach for enhancing CRT outcomes in selected LBBB patients.
Background:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been established as a key component in the management of patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction in addition to pharmacologic therapy. Several automatic algorithms have been developed to optimize the timing cycle settings in CRT, especially AV delay which was associated with improvement of the response to CRT. The present study aims to investigate whether the novel device-based SyncAV algorithm could elicit better synchrony and acute hemodynamic response.
Methods:
Thirty-six patients (age 52.81 ± 14.45 years; 69% male; 27% with ischemic cardiomyopathy; LV ejection fraction 24.81 ± 5.87%; QRS duration173.64 ± 15.99 ms) with intact atrioventricular conduction (PR interval 184.69 ± 15.43, range 150-210 ms), left bundle branch block, undergoing CRT implantation were prospectively studied. The device was programmed to two biventricular (BiV) pacing modes after the procedure: Nominal AV delay (140/110 ms) optimization (Group A), and SyncAV algorithm with optimized offset minimizing QRS duration (QRSd) (Group B). After each setting, clinical electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic data were collected at 1- and 6-months post implantation.
Results:
The intrinsic QRSd (171.50 ± 16.32 ms) was reduced to161.17 ± 19.89 ms after 1 month and to 157.44 ± 24.51ms after 6 months among group A, However, intrinsic QRSd ( 175.78 ± 15.82 ms ) was reduced to 154.00 ± 14.62 ms after 1 month and to 141.00 ± 16.45 ms after 6 months among group B [P < 0.001 versus nominal mode]) with significant improvement in clinical and echo criteria and without QRSd prolongation in any patient.
Conclusion:
Post-implant electrical optimization in already well-selected patients with left bundle branch block and optimized LV lead position is facilitated by patient-tailored BiV pacing adjusted to intrinsic atrioventricular timing using an automatic device- based algorithm.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management


