Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Assessment of the Mouth

Assessment of the Mouth

A thorough mouth assessment, including inspection and palpation of the lips, gums, tongue, tonsils, uvula, and pharynx, is crucial in detecting potential health issues. Diseases ranging from oral cancer to systemic conditions like diabetes could be identified early through careful oral examination. This article provides a detailed guide on conducting a comprehensive mouth assessment.
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Timing of Surgical Axillary Staging and Impact on Technical Success of Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction Following Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026

Same author

Antibody-drug conjugates in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC: relevant targets, clinical development, and future prospects.

Frontiers in immunology·2026

Same author

Oncoplastic chest masculinization using lateral thoracic adipofascial flaps after risk-reducing mastectomy.

JPRAS open·2026

Same author

TMR and RPNI Sustainably Reduce Long-Term Pain and Opioid Use after Oncologic Amputation: A Comparison With Untreated Amputees.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026

Same author

Innovative Approaches for Utilizing the Fibula Flap Skin Paddle in the Presence of Alternate Vessel Anatomy-A Report of Three Clinical Cases.

Microsurgery·2026

Same author

Multidisciplinary Approach to Complex Lower Extremity Limb Salvage in Pyogenic Arthritis, Pyoderma Gangrenosum, and Acne (PAPA) Syndrome: A Case Report.

Microsurgery·2026

Same journal

Preoperative Predictors of Close or Compromised Surgical Margins in Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Head & neck·2026

Same journal

Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy Reduces Major Wound Complications in Oral Cancer Surgery.

Head & neck·2026

Same journal

Botulinum Toxin for First Bite Syndrome: A Symptom-Guided "Follow-The-Pain" Injection Strategy.

Head & neck·2026

Same journal

The Impact of Margin Status Following Surgery for Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma to the Parotid Gland.

Head & neck·2026

Same journal

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Co-Designed Model of Prehabilitation for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy.

Head & neck·2026

Same journal

Neurocognitive Function in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Prior to Radiation Therapy.

Head & neck·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Single-stage Dynamic Reanimation of the Smile in Irreversible Facial Paralysis by Free Functional Muscle Transfer

Single-stage Dynamic Reanimation of the Smile in Irreversible Facial Paralysis by Free Functional Muscle Transfer

Published on: March 1, 2015

Lip Reconstruction Following Cancer Resection.

Abbas M Hassan¹, Michael M Talanker¹, Peirong Yu¹

¹Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

|August 29, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Lip reconstruction outcomes depend on patient factors and defect size. Extensive defects and combined jaw reconstruction increase complication risks, guiding a new treatment algorithm.

Keywords:

Estlander flap Karapandzic flap lip reconstruction microstomia oral incompetence

More Related Videos

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Single-stage Dynamic Reanimation of the Smile in Irreversible Facial Paralysis by Free Functional Muscle Transfer

Single-stage Dynamic Reanimation of the Smile in Irreversible Facial Paralysis by Free Functional Muscle Transfer

Published on: March 1, 2015

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

Area of Science:

Plastic Surgery
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Oncology

Background:

A comprehensive analysis of lip defects and reconstructive outcomes is currently lacking.
Understanding factors influencing lip reconstruction is crucial for improving patient results.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze lip reconstructions following cancer resection.
To identify factors associated with surgical complications, oral incompetence, and microstomia.
To propose a treatment algorithm based on identified risk factors.

Main Methods:

Retrospective analysis of 221 patients undergoing lip reconstruction between 1994 and 2024.
Statistical analysis to identify correlations between patient factors, defect characteristics, and outcomes.
Evaluation of complications including surgical complications, oral incompetence, and microstomia.

Main Results:

Tobacco use, diabetes, and concurrent jaw reconstruction were linked to surgical complications.
Recurrent disease and oral commissure resection correlated with oral incompetence.
Extensive defects (>50% lip) and tobacco use were associated with microstomia and oral incompetence.

Conclusions:

Patient-related factors (e.g., tobacco use) and defect characteristics significantly impact lip reconstruction outcomes.
Oral commissure resection, large defects, and combined jaw resections pose higher risks.
A proposed treatment algorithm aims to optimize outcomes for complex lip reconstructions.