Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

33.5K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
33.5K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.2K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.2K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

24.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.0K
Critical Thinking01:19

Critical Thinking

266
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
266
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

28.3K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
28.3K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

282
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
282

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transcriptomic responses to endurance exercise training in rats.

BMC genomic data·2026
Same author

Systems genetics reveals ITIH5 as a key mediator of adipocyte-Endothelial crosstalk.

Molecular metabolism·2026
Same author

The Rayleigh Quotient and Contrastive Principal Component Analysis II.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Hybrid crosses reveal a cell-type-specific landscape of mouse regulatory variation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The impact of package selection and versioning on single-cell RNA-seq analysis.

Cell systems·2026
Same author

Uniform pre-processing of bacterial single-cell RNA-seq.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Crepuscular vocal partitioning and thermal limits on calling behavior in the Bubbling Kassina (Kassina senegalensis) in a sub-equatorial savanna.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Jewel beetles, Buprestidae, modulate bright structural colours by multileveled optical engineering and surface sculpting.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

E122Q rhodopsin: pigment microspectrophotometry, photoreceptor light responses, and bleaching adaptation.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Greater Japanese horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus nippon) gradually converge their echolocation call frequency to colony members.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Tail-rattling in rodents: more than a threat display.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same journal

Iridescence, polarisation and directionality of Morpho butterfly displays.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

8.0K

A plea for academic truth.

Lior Pachter1

  • 1Division of Biology and Biological Engineering & Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91103, USA. lpachter@caltech.edu.

Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
|August 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific integrity is paramount. A review of Mandyam Srinivasan's neuroethology research uncovered significant data issues, prompting a debate on scientific self-correction and truth in science.

Keywords:
Eric J. WarrantHoneybee odometer controversyMandyam SrinivasanOptic flowScientific misconductTruth

More Related Videos

A Simple Dewar/Cryostat for Thermally Equilibrating Samples at Known Temperatures for Accurate Cryogenic Luminescence Measurements
06:06

A Simple Dewar/Cryostat for Thermally Equilibrating Samples at Known Temperatures for Accurate Cryogenic Luminescence Measurements

Published on: July 19, 2016

9.6K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

8.0K
A Simple Dewar/Cryostat for Thermally Equilibrating Samples at Known Temperatures for Accurate Cryogenic Luminescence Measurements
06:06

A Simple Dewar/Cryostat for Thermally Equilibrating Samples at Known Temperatures for Accurate Cryogenic Luminescence Measurements

Published on: July 19, 2016

9.6K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroethology
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Scientific Integrity

Background:

  • This work examines the self-correcting nature of science, drawing on Naomi Oreskes' "Why Trust Science?"
  • A preprint identified numerous issues in ten papers by neuroethologist Mandyam Srinivasan, including duplicated data.
  • These findings challenge the reliability of published scientific research.

Discussion:

  • Eric Warrant's editorial response to the Srinivasan critique is analyzed.
  • Warrant's dismissal of data duplication as "sloppiness" and personal attacks are critiqued.
  • The importance of rigorous peer review and addressing scientific misconduct is emphasized.

Key Insights:

  • The social process of science, including inter-scientist challenges, is crucial for uncovering truth.
  • Identical data reported for different experiments raises serious concerns about research validity.
  • Dismissing valid critiques through ad hominem attacks hinders scientific progress.

Outlook:

  • Upholding truth and accuracy in scientific reporting is essential for the advancement of neuroethology and all scientific fields.
  • Promoting a culture of accountability and robust peer review strengthens scientific reliability.
  • Further examination of scientific self-correction mechanisms is warranted to ensure research integrity.