Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

154
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
154
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.2K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

340
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
340
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

174
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
174
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

671
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
671
Bias01:22

Bias

4.9K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perspective: Machine Learning for Health Should Consider Social Drivers of Health.

Proceedings of machine learning research·2026
Same author

A Microsimulation-Based Approach for Mitigating Societal Bias in Chronic Kidney Disease Data.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

Fully Automated Abstraction of Longitudinal Breast Oncology Records with Off-The-Shelf Large Language Models.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Health Benefits, Costs, and Cost-Effectiveness of Jail-Based Hepatitis C Elimination Strategies.

JAMA internal medicine·2026
Same author

A Novel Decision-Modeling Framework for Health Policy Analyses When Outcomes Are Influenced by Social and Disease Processes.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

Causal modeling of chronic kidney disease in a participatory framework for informing the inclusion of social drivers in health algorithms.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same journal

Special Communications in JAMA Health Forum.

JAMA health forum·2026
Same journal

Exposure to Hurricane-Related Flooding and Outcomes of Home Health Care Patients.

JAMA health forum·2026
Same journal

GLP-1 Prescriptions for Weight Loss by Differences in Insurance Plan Coverage.

JAMA health forum·2026
Same journal

Geographic Availability and Use of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Among Medicaid Enrollees.

JAMA health forum·2026
Same journal

Scoring Health Reform-Congress Needs a Wider Aperture and Longer Exposure.

JAMA health forum·2026
Same journal

Making Policy When the Perfect Is Impossible.

JAMA health forum·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K

Algorithms to Improve Fairness in Medicare Risk Adjustment.

Marissa B Reitsma1, Thomas G McGuire2, Sherri Rose1

  • 1Department of Health Policy, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

JAMA Health Forum
|August 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New algorithms can improve fairness in Medicare risk adjustment payments. These methods aim to reduce health care spending disparities with minimal impact on overall performance.

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Health equity
  • Algorithmic fairness

Background:

  • Payment system design significantly influences healthcare spending, access, and outcomes.
  • Medicare Advantage represents over half of Medicare spending, making its risk adjustment algorithm crucial for broad impact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate algorithmic tools for equitable Medicare risk adjustment payment.
  • To maintain performance, flexibility, feasibility, transparency, and interpretability.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of Medicare enrollment and claims data (2017-2020).
  • Utilized demographic indicators and hierarchical condition categories to predict subsequent year Medicare spending.
  • Employed constrained regression and postprocessing to assess fairness and performance.

Main Results:

  • Constrained regression and postprocessing achieved fair spending targets with minimal reduction in payment system fit (12.6%-12.7%).
  • Postprocessing increased payments for minoritized racial/ethnic groups.
  • Constrained regression benefited minoritized groups and those in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.

Conclusions:

  • Constrained regression and postprocessing offer feasible methods to integrate fairness into Medicare risk adjustment.
  • These algorithmic adjustments can help policymakers address health care disparities via payment reform.