Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Development and Evaluation of a Brief Social Isolation Measure in the Nationally-Representative Health and Retirement
Irena Cenzer1, Jacqueline M Torres2, Yulin Yang2
1Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Background:
The Health and Retirement Study (HRS) has been central to identifying social isolation as a key determinant of health among older adults. However, prior HRS social isolation measures have relied on a subset of participants responding to a leave-behind questionnaire (LBQ), which limits longitudinal analyses, sample size, and inclusion of individuals with cognitive impairment who require a proxy. This study developed a brief social isolation scale that can be used in the full HRS cohort.
Methods:
We used 2016 and 2018 HRS data, including 6122 adults ≥ 65 years old. The brief 5-Item "Core" Social Isolation Measure (Range: 0-8 Points) Included Items From the HRS core interview administered to all respondents: marital status, household size, proximity to children, religious participation, and volunteering. We compared three cutoffs (≤ 1, ≤ 2, ≤ 3) to cutoffs for previously established scales (Kotwal and Crowe) Using Sensitivity, specificity, and overall classification accuracy. We also compared the prevalence across demographic and health subgroups, and construct validity through associations with loneliness, depressive, symptoms, and life satisfaction.
Results:
Participants were on average 75.4 years old (SD 7.2), 60% women, and 10% socially isolated using the Kotwal measure and 27% using the Crowe measure. A core measure cutoff of ≤ 2 correctly classified 83.1% vs. Kotwal (Sensitivity: 81.0%, Specificity: 83.2%) and 77.4% vs. Crowe (51.3%, 86.8%). At cutoff ≤ 3, accuracy was 66.6% vs. Kotwal (95.6%, 63.2%) and 70.3% vs. Crowe (74.6%, 68.8%). All three measures showed strong construct validity with loneliness, depressive symptoms, and life satisfaction, and relatively consistent prevalence estimates across sociodemographic and health groups.
Conclusions:
A Brief Social Isolation Measure Aligns Well With Longer, Previously-Established Measures While Addressing Key Limitations in Data Availability and Sample Representativeness. Researchers Should Consider the Appropriate Cutoff Depending on the Research Context, and the Relative Importance of Sensitivity, Specificity, and Sample Size.
Related Concept Videos
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
01:30Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
01:30Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
01:20Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
01:26Longitudinal Studies
01:23Investigation of Disease Outbreaks