Examining the Performance of Polygenic Risk Scores for Alzheimer Disease Within and Across Populations Using k-Fold
Michael D Osterman1, Yeunjoo E Song1, Audrey Lynn1
1From the Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences (M.D.O., Y.E.S., A.L., K.M., N.R.W., J.B., W.S.B., J.L.H.); Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology (M.D.O., Y.E.S., A.L., W.S.B., J.L.H.), Case Western Reserve University, OH; Department of Medicine (Biomedical Genetics) (L.A.F.), Boston University, Boston, MA; Penn Neurodegeneration Genomics Center (G.D.S.), Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia; The John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics (E.R.M., M.A.P.-V.), The University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; and Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Human Genetics (E.R.M., M.A.P.-V.), University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) perform best within specific racial/ethnic groups. Developing diverse datasets is crucial for improving PRS accuracy and transferability across populations.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Population Genetics
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Alzheimer's disease (AD) has a complex genetic basis, but most genetic studies focus on European ancestry populations.
- Genetic risk prediction tools, like polygenic risk scores (PRSs), may perform differently across diverse racial and ethnic groups.
- Understanding these variations is key to equitable genetic risk assessment for AD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the performance and transferability of AD-specific polygenic risk scores (PRSs) across different race and ethnicity groups.
- To evaluate how PRS accuracy varies when trained and tested within and across Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic White individuals.
- To establish a framework for enhancing PRS utility in diverse populations.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed 11,254 individuals from the Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) Release 3, categorized into Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic White groups.
- Employed a 5-fold cross-validation approach for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and PRS construction within each group.
- Calculated the area under the curve (AUC) to assess PRS performance, examining various criteria including APOE region, sex-specific PRSs, and sample sizes.
Main Results:
- PRSs trained within the same race/ethnicity group consistently outperformed those trained in other groups, particularly benefiting the Hispanic group.
- The variability in AUC across iterations was greater when PRSs were applied across different racial/ethnic groups.
- These findings remained consistent even after including covariates like APOE, sex, and age, and with different PRS generation criteria.
Conclusions:
- AD polygenic risk scores exhibit variable performance and limited transferability across different race and ethnicity groups.
- The study underscores the critical need for diverse population data to improve the accuracy and applicability of genetic risk prediction for AD.
- This research provides a foundation for developing more equitable and effective PRS tools for Alzheimer's disease research and clinical applications.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...
Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment
Polygenic Traits
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...


