Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

61.6K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
61.6K
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

196
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
196
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

154
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
154
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

10.0K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
10.0K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.9K
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory01:20

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

506
Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
506

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Equivalence of in vitro blood clot mechanical properties using different anticoagulants.

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials·2026
Same author

Mobility Network-based Measurement of Local Collective Efficacy and its Consequences for the Spatial Patterning of Violent Crime.

Journal of quantitative criminology·2026
Same author

MonotonicityTest: An R Package for Efficient Nonparametric Monotonicity Testing.

Observational studies·2026
Same author

Differences in Telemedicine Use Between Rural and Urban Medicare Beneficiaries With Kidney Failure.

Kidney medicine·2026
Same author

Socioeconomic status and acculturation as determinants of atopic disease prevalence in United States Latino children.

Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology·2026
Same author

Assessing surrogate heterogeneity in real world data using meta-learners.

Journal of causal inference·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 9, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Avoiding the Surrogate Paradox: An Empirical Framework for Assessing Assumptions.

Emily Hsiao1, Lu Tian2, Layla Parast1

  • 1Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 105 E 24th St D9800, Austin, TX 78705.

Journal of Nonparametric Statistics
|August 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new statistical framework to prevent the surrogate paradox in clinical trials. It ensures accurate treatment effect conclusions by rigorously testing surrogate marker assumptions.

Keywords:
hypothesis testingmonotonicitystochastic dominancesurrogate markertreatment effect

More Related Videos

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

4.0K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 9, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

4.0K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Decision Making

Background:

  • Surrogate markers offer potential for earlier clinical trial conclusions.
  • The surrogate paradox, where a marker conflicts with the primary outcome, can lead to erroneous treatment assessments.
  • Existing methods lack robust frameworks for empirically validating surrogate marker assumptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a formal nonparametric framework for empirically examining and testing assumptions that prevent the surrogate paradox.
  • To provide statistical tools for researchers to ensure reliable interpretation of surrogate marker data in clinical trials.
  • To enhance the validity of treatment effectiveness decisions based on surrogate outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a formal nonparametric framework to empirically assess surrogate marker validity.
  • Developed nonparametric hypothesis tests for key assumptions ensuring avoidance of the surrogate paradox.
  • Derived theoretical properties of the proposed tests.
  • Analyzed test performance using simulations and real-world data.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework provides a rigorous method to test assumptions underlying surrogate marker use.
  • Nonparametric hypothesis tests were formally derived and their finite sample properties analyzed.
  • Simulations demonstrated the practical performance of the proposed testing procedures.
  • The framework was successfully applied to data from the Diabetes Prevention Program trial.

Conclusions:

  • The developed nonparametric framework offers a robust approach to mitigate the surrogate paradox in clinical trials.
  • The proposed hypothesis tests provide empirical tools to validate surrogate marker reliability.
  • This methodology can lead to more accurate and trustworthy conclusions regarding treatment efficacy.
  • Application to the Diabetes Prevention Program trial highlights the practical utility of the framework.