Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Triarchic Theory of Intelligence01:24

Triarchic Theory of Intelligence

8.9K
Robert Sternberg's triarchic theory of intelligence posits that intelligence is composed of three distinct but interrelated components: analytical, creative, and practical intelligence.
8.9K
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

3.0K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
3.0K
Multiple Intelligences Theory01:20

Multiple Intelligences Theory

8.2K
Howard Gardner's theory of Multiple Intelligence proposes that there are nine distinct types of intelligence, each reflecting different ways of interacting with the world. Introduced in 1983 and expanded in subsequent years, Gardner's framework challenges the traditional notion of a single, generalized intelligence.
8.2K
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

12.7K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
12.7K
Critical Thinking I01:24

Critical Thinking I

3.5K
Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career...
3.5K
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

7.8K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
7.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unveiling the role of higher education institutions in regional sustainability transitions: a systematic literature review and research agenda.

Sustainability science·2026
Same author

Fragmented Governance, Shared Landscapes: Policy and Functional (In)Coherence Insights from the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area.

Environmental management·2025
Same author

Mission-oriented agrifood innovation systems in the making: a transdisciplinary approach to identify context-specific drivers of change.

Sustainability science·2025
Same author

How to integrate youth in regional sustainability transformation processes: Tools, structures, and effects.

Ambio·2024
Same author

Simulated Patients to Demonstrate Common Stroke Syndromes: Accurate and Convincing.

Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Covid-19 and outdoor recreation - Lessons learned? Introduction to the special issue on "Outdoor recreation and Covid-19: Its effects on people, parks and landscapes".

Journal of outdoor recreation and tourism·2023
Same journal

Role of humanities in medical curricula in the South-East Asia region: a scoping review.

Humanities & social sciences communications·2026
Same journal

Aristotle's intuitionist approach to morality guides a new direction in moral psychology.

Humanities & social sciences communications·2026
Same journal

When genomics meets geopolitics.

Humanities & social sciences communications·2026
Same journal

The unheard path: carer loneliness and epistemic injustice in critical and historical view.

Humanities & social sciences communications·2026
Same journal

Traffic jams: music and traffic noise interact to influence the vividness, sentiment, and spatiotemporal properties of directed mental imagery.

Humanities & social sciences communications·2026
Same journal

The politicization of ESG investing shows why ESG metrics cannot be depoliticized.

Humanities & social sciences communications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.8K

Evaluating transdisciplinary methods: a new scale for measuring knowledge integration.

Cornelia Fischer1, Katharina Gugerell2,3, Ursula Laa4

  • 1Department of Economics and Social Sciences, BOKU University, Vienna, Austria.

Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
|August 29, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new scale measures how transdisciplinary research integrates knowledge, revealing socio-emotional and cognitive-communicative factors. This tool aids in comparing methods for tackling complex societal challenges.

Keywords:
Environmental studiesScience, technology and society

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.8K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.0K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.1K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Knowledge Management
  • Interdisciplinary Studies

Background:

  • Transdisciplinary research integrates diverse knowledge for societal challenges.
  • Effectiveness of transdisciplinary methods is under-researched due to a lack of measurement tools.
  • Knowledge integration is key to transdisciplinary success, yet its measurement is complex.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Develop and empirically test a novel scale to assess the contribution of transdisciplinary methods to knowledge integration.
  • Provide a standardized instrument for evaluating the effectiveness of transdisciplinary approaches.
  • Facilitate comparative analysis of different transdisciplinary methods.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of 48 sources to synthesize over 300 statements into 34 items.
  • Empirical testing of items in workshops with 71 participants using transdisciplinary scenario building and serious game development.
  • Exploratory factor analysis to refine the scale and identify dimensions of knowledge integration.

Main Results:

  • Developed a refined 25-item scale for measuring knowledge integration in transdisciplinary research.
  • Identified two key dimensions of knowledge integration: socio-emotional and cognitive-communicative factors.
  • Successfully employed the scale to compare the knowledge integration contributions of two distinct transdisciplinary methods.

Conclusions:

  • The developed scale offers a methodological improvement for measuring transdisciplinary research effectiveness.
  • The scale enables comparative analysis of transdisciplinary methods, supporting informed selection.
  • Further refinement of the scale is recommended to enhance its utility and scope.