Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Measurement of the Hand Transmitted Vibration of the Human Hand Arm System During Operation of a Hand Tractor
Published on: June 16, 2021
Low frequency magnetic field induction factors for exposure assessment in the human hand
Pia Schneeweiss1, Rene Hirtl1, Gernot Schmid1
1Seibersdorf Laboratories, EMC & Optics, A-2444 Seibersdorf, Austria.
Abstract:
According to European Union (EU) Directive 2013/35/EU, occupational low frequency magnetic field exposure of the hands is assessed by comparing the maximum magnetic induction with the corresponding action level for the limbs (ALLimb). If ALLimbis exceeded, it must be demonstrated that the exposure limit values (ELVs) defined by the 2 × 2 × 2 mm3averagedin situelectric field strength (Êi,avg) are not exceeded. However, there is no solid scientific evidence for the currently used ALLimb. Assuming that ALLimbensures compliance with the ELV in all limb regions, including areas with larger cross-sections like the lap, questions arise about its conservatism for exposure assessment of localized hand exposure. Therefore, we derived reasonable worst-case induction factors (IFs) for the hand using systematic numerical computations on 16 different MRI-based high-resolution anatomical hand models. Two simplified hand models were also included for comparison. The simulations yielded a robust IF of 0.6 (V m-1) T-1Hz-1for a hand size representing the 95th percentile of adult males. This corresponds to a 33% relaxation of the magnetic induction limit compared to the current ALLimb, which may reduce unnecessary restrictions in many workplaces with localized hand exposure. However, these relaxed limits must not be applied to other limb regions without proper verification. Furthermore, the study shows that oversimplified hand models, as proposed in the European standard EN 62369-1:2009, tend to significantly underestimate exposure and should therefore no longer be used for dosimetric exposure assessment. Finally, the data obtained confirm that in the case of localized exposure of body parts, comparing the 99th percentile ofÊi,avginstead of the (reasonably evaluated) peak spatialÊi,avgwith the ELV leads to a significant underestimation of exposure, because real 'hot spots' ofÊi,avgare excluded from the evaluation, although they should be taken into account to avoid localized effects on the nervous system.
Related Concept Videos
Induced Electric Fields: Applications
Faraday's Law
Magnetic Field Due To A Thin Straight Wire
Induction
A...
Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability
When diamagnetic materials are placed under an external magnetic field, the moments opposite to the field are induced. Hence, the susceptibility for diamagnets has a minimal negative value of 10-5–10-6. Since...
Induced Electric Fields

