Early-life cognitive effects of prebiotics and probiotics: A cross-species systematic review

Saúl Sal-Sarria1, Philip W J Burnet2

  • 1Laboratory of Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain; Institute of Neurosciences of the Principality of Asturias (INEUROPA), Oviedo, Spain; Health Research Institute of the Principality of Asturias (ISPA), Oviedo, Spain.

PubMed

Insights

Prebiotics and probiotics show promise for early-life cognitive development in animal studies, improving memory and learning. However, human trial results are mixed, indicating more research is needed for definitive conclusions.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Microbiology
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Early-life cognitive development is crucial for long-term outcomes.
  • The gut microbiome is increasingly recognized for its influence on brain health.
  • Prebiotic and probiotic interventions aim to modulate the gut microbiota.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the effects of prebiotic and probiotic interventions on early-life cognitive development.
  • To evaluate evidence from both animal models and human studies.
  • To explore potential mechanisms underlying observed effects.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
  • Inclusion of 39 studies published between 2015-2025.
  • Searches conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases.

Main Results:

  • Probiotics (Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium) consistently enhanced cognitive functions in rodents, especially under stress/neuroinflammation.
  • Porcine models showed variable learning and memory benefits.
  • Human trials presented mixed results regarding improvements in language, attention, and behavior.

Conclusions:

  • Preclinical data strongly suggest cognitive benefits from microbiota-targeted interventions.
  • Translational evidence in humans is uncertain due to study heterogeneity and limited pediatric data.
  • Future research requires longitudinal human trials and direct comparisons of intervention types.