Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

06:24
Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing
Published on: May 28, 2013
42.0K
Test design and results of a method performance characterization study for SPF and UVA-PF testing
Bertrand Colson1, Jürgen Vollhardt2, Curtis Cole3
1QuoData GmbH, Dresden, Germany.
International Journal of Cosmetic Science
|September 1, 2025
Summary
This study characterized alternative sunscreen testing methods against ISO 24444 and ISO 24443 standards. Precision and variation sources were identified for SPF and UVA-PF testing across diverse product groups.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology and Photobiology
- Analytical Chemistry
- Cosmetic Science
Background:
- Standardized testing is crucial for sunscreen efficacy claims.
- Existing ISO methods (24444 for SPF, 24443 for UVA-PF) serve as benchmarks.
- Characterizing alternative methods ensures reliable and comparable results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of alternative SPF and UVA-PF testing methods.
- To compare these methods against established ISO 24444 and ISO 24443 standards.
- To identify sources of variation in sunscreen testing.
Main Methods:
- A factorial experimental design was employed with 32 sunscreens across eight product groups.
- Four participating laboratories were involved to ensure statistical reliability.
- Performance criteria included reproducibility precision, between-laboratory variation, and bias.
Main Results:
- Performance characteristics and reproducibility/repeatability limits for the reference methods are presented.
- Analysis identified main sources of variation for both ISO 24444 and ISO 24443.
- Precision was characterized for each of the eight product groups.
Conclusions:
- The precision of ISO 24444 and ISO 24443 was successfully characterized.
- Key sources of variation influencing test results were identified.
- Reproducibility and repeatability limits provide valuable data for method validation.

