Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy DISE with Target Controlled Infusion TCI and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Mandibular Advancement Device versus CPAP in Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea
J T Colpani1, Y-H Ou2, A M Kosasih2
1Discipline of Endodontics, Operative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract:
Severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes. While continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment, mandibular advancement devices (MADs) offer an alternative. This substudy of a randomized trial compared the effectiveness of MADs versus CPAP on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP), sleep-related quality of life, myocardial remodeling, ambulatory heart rhythm, and biomarkers in severe OSA. A total of 144 participants were randomized to MAD (n = 73) or CPAP (n = 71) for 12 mo. Median nightly usage was 5.4 (2.9-6.5) h for the MAD group (≥6 h/night: 56.1%) and 4.9 (4.0-6.0) h for the CPAP group (≥6 h/night: 28.3%). The apnea-hypopnea index at baseline and 6 mo was 44.0 (37.6-59.2) and 20.9 (11.7-31.9) events/h in the MAD group and 50.7 (40.7-59.8) and 2.1 (1.2-3.4) events/h in the CPAP group, respectively. MAD treatment reduced asleep mean BP (-4.7 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.3 to -4.0, P = 0.015), asleep systolic BP (-2.0 mm Hg, 95% CI: -10.0 to -4.0, P = 0.047), and asleep diastolic BP (-4.0 mm Hg, 95% CI: -9.0 to -3.0, P = 0.007), whereas CPAP showed no significant changes. The between-group differences favored MAD in asleep mean BP (-3.70 mm Hg, 95% CI: -7.40 to 0.00, P = 0.050) and asleep systolic BP (-4.78 mm Hg, 95% CI: -9.51 to 0.04, P = 0.048). Both improved sleep-related quality of life, although CPAP had a slightly greater effect on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (Δ1.63, 95% CI: 0.45 to 2.81, P = 0.007). No significant changes were observed in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters, ambulatory heart rhythm, or biomarkers. Adverse effects included jaw pain (14.8%) and teeth discomfort (8.2%) with MAD, whereas CPAP users reported dry mouth (50.8%), nasal congestion (23.0%), and air leakage (29.5%). In conclusion, these findings suggested MAD could be an acceptable and effective treatment for patients with severe OSA and hypertension. The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04119999).
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Sleep Apnea
The condition is more prevalent among...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Oxygen Delivering System I: Nasal Cannula and Face Mask
Nasal Cannula
A nasal cannula is a lightweight tube split at one end into two prongs and placed in the nostrils. It is typically used to deliver low to medium levels of oxygen.
Suggested flow rate: The suggested flow rate for a nasal cannula typically ranges between 1 and 6 L/min.
Oxygen percentage setting:...

