Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
Published on: February 23, 2024
Prediction of Activity and Selectivity Profiles of Sigma Receptor Ligands Using Machine Learning Approaches
Lisa Lombardo1, Verena Battisti2, Thierry Langer2
1Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences (CHIBIOFARAM), University of Messina, Viale Ferdinando D'Alcontres 13, I-98166 Messina, Italy.
None:
Sigma (σ) receptors (SRs) have emerged as important therapeutic targets due to their roles in various biological pathways. They are classified into two subtypes: S1R, primarily distributed in the central nervous system and related to neuroprotection and neurodegenerative diseases, and S2R mainly expressed in cancer cells and associated with cell proliferation and apoptosis, as well as in neurons. Although S1R and S2R exhibit structural differences in receptor architecture and assembly, they share similar binding site features and ligand recognition mechanisms. This similarity underscores the importance of identifying selective ligands for therapeutic design, especially given the distinct physiological functions of these receptors. In this project, we developed three distinct machine learning (ML) approaches based on classification, regression, and multiclassification models to predict the activity and selectivity profiles of SR ligands. High-quality data sets were curated from public and in-house source; in turn, the data sets were systematically organized and processed for each workflow. Models were built using molecular descriptors and fingerprints, including Mordred, RDKit, ECFP4, ECFP6, and MACCS keys, and trained with various ML algorithms such as extra trees, random forest, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, and XGBoost. Rigorous nested and classical 5-fold cross-validation protocols were applied for model selection and validation. At the end, identification of the best workflow was performed by an external validation procedure. Among the workflows, the one-step multiclassification approach, based on extra trees combined with Mordred descriptors, showed the best predictive performance in external validation, offering a robust tool for the identification of selective S1R and S2R ligands.
More Related Videos
10:29Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
06:50Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
Related Concept Videos
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Drug-Receptor Interactions
Several parameters, such as the drug's affinity for its receptor and its efficacy, which is its ability to activate the receptor, determine the drug's effect on the tissue....