Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

Minimally Invasive Transverse Aortic Constriction in Mice
Published on: March 14, 2017
Mavacamten in Symptomatic Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Milind Y Desai1,2, Anjali T Owens3, Theodore Abraham4
1Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland.
Insights
Mavacamten did not significantly improve exercise capacity or patient-reported health in nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Further research is needed to understand its role in this patient population.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Mavacamten is approved for symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
- Its efficacy in nonobstructive HCM is not well-established.
- This study investigates mavacamten's effects in patients with symptomatic nonobstructive HCM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of mavacamten in improving functional capacity.
- To assess the impact of mavacamten on patient-reported health status in nonobstructive HCM.
- To determine if mavacamten offers benefits beyond placebo in this patient group.
Main Methods:
- A Phase 3, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
- 289 patients received mavacamten, 291 received placebo for 48 weeks.
- Primary endpoints: change in peak oxygen uptake and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score (KCCQ-CSS).
Main Results:
- Mavacamten showed a non-significant trend towards improved peak oxygen uptake (0.47 ml/kg/min difference, P=0.07).
- KCCQ-CSS scores improved slightly more with mavacamten (2.7 points difference, P=0.06), but not significantly.
- Adverse events, including reduced ejection fraction, were more frequent with mavacamten.
Conclusions:
- Mavacamten did not demonstrate statistically significant improvements in functional capacity or symptoms compared to placebo in nonobstructive HCM.
- The drug did not meet primary endpoints in this study population.
- Further investigation may be warranted to clarify mavacamten's role in nonobstructive HCM.
Background:
Mavacamten is approved to treat adults with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, its effects in nonobstructive HCM remain uncertain.
Methods:
We conducted a phase 3, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial to determine whether mavacamten improves functional capacity and patient-reported health status among adults with symptomatic nonobstructive HCM. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive mavacamten (starting at 5 mg per day and adjusted up to a maximum of 15 mg per day on the basis of left ventricular ejection fraction) or placebo (with sham dose adjustment) for 48 weeks. The two primary end points were the change from baseline to week 48 in peak oxygen uptake and in the 23-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score (KCCQ-CSS; scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status).
Results:
We randomly assigned 289 patients to receive mavacamten and 291 to receive placebo. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 56±15 years, and 46% were women. From baseline to week 48, the least-squares mean change in peak oxygen uptake was 0.52 ml per kilogram of body weight per minute (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09 to 0.95) in the mavacamten group and 0.05 ml per kilogram per minute (95% CI, -0.38 to 0.47) in the placebo group (between-group difference, 0.47 ml per kilogram per minute; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.98; P = 0.07). The least-squares mean change in the KCCQ-CSS was 13.1 points (95% CI, 10.7 to 15.5) in the mavacamten group and 10.4 points (95% CI, 8.0 to 12.8) in the placebo group (between-group difference, 2.7 points; 95% CI, -0.1 to 5.6; P = 0.06). Reductions in ejection fraction and interruptions in the trial regimen were more common with mavacamten than with placebo.
Conclusions:
Among patients with nonobstructive HCM, mavacamten did not result in a significantly greater improvement in peak oxygen uptake or decrease in symptoms than placebo. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; ODYSSEY-HCM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05582395.).
More Related Videos
07:38Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Right Ventricle Function in a Rat Model of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Published on: January 20, 2023
03:45Investigating the Pathogenesis of MYH7 Mutation Gly823Glu in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using a Mouse Model
Published on: August 8, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management