Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2025

A Multimodal Imaging- and Stimulation-based Method of Evaluating Connectivity-related Brain Excitability in Patients with Epilepsy
Published on: November 13, 2016
Effects of Centromedian Nucleus Stimulation on Interictal Scalp EEG Burden in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome
Adithya Sivaraju1, James Poe2, Hal Blumenfed2
1Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA, adithya.sivaraju@yale.edu.
Introduction:
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the centromedian (CM) thalamic nucleus is a potential therapy for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), a severe and drug-resistant epileptic encephalopathy. While long-term seizure outcomes with CM-DBS have been described, its acute electrophysiological effects and predictive value remain uncertain. We examined whether short-term changes in interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) following CM-DBS relate to seizure outcomes at 1 year.
Methods:
Ten patients with LGS underwent CM-DBS implantation. About 1 month post-surgery, each patient had a 1-h scalp EEG. After a 10-min baseline, stimulation began at 1 V for 5 min, increasing in 1 V increments to 5 V or until paresthesias occurred. IEDs were detected automatically (Persyst v14c) and verified by an expert reviewer. Patients were followed for 1 year, with clinical response defined as ≥50% seizure reduction, i.e., responder. Correlations between acute IED change and seizure outcomes were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation.
Results:
Nine of 10 patients showed reduced IED burden during acute stimulation (31%-100%). At 1 year, 8 were responders and 2 nonresponders. Overall, acute IED reduction did not correlate with seizure outcome (Spearman's ρ = 0.3, p = 0.35). A ≥50% reduction in IED burden was seen in 7 of 7 responders versus 1 of 3 nonresponders, suggesting a nonsignificant trend toward predictive value (p = 0.06).
Conclusion:
Acute CM-DBS reduced IED burden in most patients with LGS but did not significantly predict long-term seizure outcomes. A trend toward greater IED reduction in responders suggests possible biomarker potential, though findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating. Limitations include small sample size, high responder rate, and short EEG duration. Larger studies with extended monitoring are needed to clarify the clinical utility of acute EEG changes as predictors of CM-DBS efficacy.
More Related Videos
09:00Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex
Published on: April 15, 2015
09:57Author Spotlight: Advancing Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery in Children Through Novel Biomarkers and Enhanced Localization
Published on: September 20, 2024