Is complete elimination of lateral spreading response essential in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm?

The objective was to investigate whether complete intraoperative elimination of the lateral spread response (LSR) is essential during microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm (HFS) and to identify a quantitative intraoperative biomarker predictive of favorable outcomes.

The authors retrospectively analyzed 208 adult patients who underwent MVD for primary HFS. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) included LSR recordings from three facial muscles. Based on clinical outcomes at the 6-month postoperative follow-up, patients were independently categorized into two binary outcome groups-completely resolved (CR) versus non-CR, and clinically improved (CI) versus non-CI-for separate analyses. The final-to-baseline amplitude change ratio (FBCR) of LSR amplitude was calculated. Predictive thresholds were identified using machine learning models including random forest and decision trees.

LSR was most frequently observed in the mentalis (96.2%) and orbicularis oris (92.3%). Complete disappearance of LSR was not a prerequisite for achieving either CI or CR outcomes. FBCR ≥ 86.5% in the mentalis muscle predicted CR with 88% accuracy, 99% sensitivity, and 47% specificity. FBCR ≥ 48.5% predicted CI with 98% accuracy and 91% specificity. Multivariate models did not significantly improve prediction compared to mentalis FBCR alone.

Complete elimination of LSR is not essential for clinical success in MVD for HFS. A quantitative reduction in LSR amplitude, especially in the mentalis muscle, provides a robust and practical intraoperative predictor of both objective and subjective outcomes. These findings advocate for a shift toward a muscle-specific, threshold-driven strategy for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in HFS surgery.